Pixel

Engineering

Ecology

Biology

Aerial imagery

Statistics

Cartography

Systems engineering

Vegetation (pathology)

Computer science

Physical geography

Satellite imagery

Mechanical engineering

Estimation

Mathematics

Maximum a posteriori estimation

Geography

Environmental science

RGB color model

Artificial intelligence

Remote sensing

Land use

Medicine

Vegetation cover

Cover (algebra)

Maximum likelihood

Mean squared error

Endmember

Computer vision

Pathology

ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

Remote sensing via unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is becoming a very important tool for augmenting traditional spaceborne and airborne remote sensing techniques. Commercial RGB cameras are often the payload on UAVs, because they are inexpensive, easy to operate and require little data processing. RGB images are increasingly being used for mapping of fractional vegetation cover (FVC). However, the presence of significantly mixed pixels in close-range RGB images prevents the accurate estimation of FVC. Even where pixel unmixing is applied, limited quantitative spectral information and colour variability within these images could lead to profound errors and uncertainties. This paper proposes a colour mixture analysis (CMA) method based on the Hue-Saturation-Value (HSV) colour space to alleviate the above-mentioned concerns, thereby improving the accuracy and efficiency of FVC estimation from UAV-captured RGB images. First, the a priori colour information of the pure vegetation and background endmembers are extracted from the Hue channel of the UAV proximal sensing images, obviating ground-based image capture and the attendant cost and inconvenience. Second, the relationship between the probability distribution of mixed pixels and that of the two endmembers is estimated. Finally, we estimate FVC from UAV remote sensing images with a maximum a posteriori parameter (MAP) estimator. Two UAV-captured RGB image datasets and a synthetic RGB image dataset were used to test the new method. CMA was compared with three other FVC estimation algorithms, namely, FCLS, HAGFVC and LAB2. The FVC estimates by CMA were found to be highly accurate, with root mean squared errors (RMSE) of less than 0.007 and mean absolute error (MAE) of less than 0.01 for both field datasets. The accuracy was shown to be superior to that of all three algorithms. A comprehensive analysis of the estimation accuracy under various spatial resolutions and vegetation cover levels was conducted using both field and synthetic datasets. Results show that the CMA method can robustly and accurately estimate FVC across the full range of vegetation coverage and various resolutions. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of colour variability due to heterogeneity and shadow were also tested. Overall, CMA was shown to be robust to variation in colour and illumination.

Improving the estimation of fractional vegetation cover from UAV RGB imagery by colour unmixing