Frame analysis

Politics of the United States

Monster

Literature

Archaeology

Presidential campaign

Political action

Business

Presidential system

Advertising

Politics

Demonization

Political science

Presidential election

Sociology

Content analysis

Framing (construction)

Media studies

Social science

History

Rhetoric and Public Affairs

American politics and horror have been linked since the birth of the United States. Within this genre, two frames of horror are common: the classic and the conflicted. The 2016 presidential campaign advertisements of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton employed these horror frames in vastly different ways. Analysis of these ads as a part of an extended message to the American public reveals that Clinton primarily used a conflicted horror frame when attacking Trump, with some rare usage of the classic horror frame. Further, her campaign gave little in the way of audience efficacy through positive assessments of herself, specific policy proposals to defeat the monster, or calls for collective, mob action. Trump, however, almost exclusively used the classic horror frame to articulate threats to America. Even though this frame is more conducive to conventional demonization and fear mongering, Trump also included specific policy proposals, numerous positive assessments of himself, and a call for mob action by American voters to slay the monsters facing the country.

The Monstrous Election: Horror Framing in Televised Campaign Advertisements during the 2016 Presidential Election