Systematic sampling

Robot

Process (computing)

Statistics

Motion planning

Computer security

Operating system

Random tree

Data mining

Computer science

Collision

Filter (signal processing)

Operations research

Mathematics

Collision detection

Sampling (signal processing)

Mathematical analysis

Path (computing)

Artificial intelligence

Tree (set theory)

Programming language

Computer vision

IEEE Access

Path planning is one of the most important process on applications such as navigating autonomous vehicles, computer graphics, game development, robotics, and protein folding. It ensures that a path is planned between an initial and final position on the collision-free region of a search space if one exists. One of the most wide algorithms used for this purpose is the rapidly-exploring random tree (RRT), in which each node of a tree data structure is generated from a search space by a random sampling process, which originally follows a uniform spatial distribution. However, some authors claim that the addition of a non-uniform/informed approach into the sampling process of the RRT could accelerate the planning time of the algorithm. Actually, many works on literature propose different strategies to include non-uniform/informed behavior on RRT-based algorithms. However, the large number of studies on path planning subject impose difficulties on the identification of new solutions on a review process. The aim of this paper is to structure a review process to deal with the massive volume of works on this subject, by presenting the planning, development, and results of a systematic literature review (SLR), to investigate non-uniform/informed sampling solutions applied to RRT-based algorithms on path planning literature. A review protocol with two scientific questions was developed to guide the investigation. As a result, 1136 studies were selected in the path planning literature, of which 53 were identified as claiming to contain a solution with non-uniform/informed sampling on RRT-based algorithms. As a specific work is considered a scientific contribution only when it has not yet been explored in scientific circles, the results of the SLR can be used as a tool to search for what has not yet been proposed, helping to identify opportunities to contribute with new sampling processes of RRT-based algorithms. To the best knowledge of the authors, this paper presents the first development of an SLR of a topic related to the RRT algorithm.

Systematic Literature Review of Sampling Process in Rapidly-Exploring Random Trees