Library science

Ecology

Biology

Social psychology

Citation impact

Public relations

Altmetrics

Amazon rainforest

Set (abstract data type)

Impact factor

Computer science

Psychology

Discipline

Political science

Sociology

Citation

Data science

Citation analysis

Programming language

Subject (documents)

Bibliometrics

Popularity

Social science

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Although citation counts are often used to evaluate the research impact of academic publications, they are problematic for books that aim for educational or cultural impact. To fill this gap, this article assesses whether a number of simple metrics derived from A mazon.com reviews of academic books could provide evidence of their impact. Based on a set of 2,739 academic monographs from 2008 and a set of 1,305 best‐selling books in 15 A mazon.com academic subject categories, the existence of significant but low or moderate correlations between citations and numbers of reviews, combined with other evidence, suggests that online book reviews tend to reflect the wider popularity of a book rather than its academic impact, although there are substantial disciplinary differences. Metrics based on online reviews are therefore recommended for the evaluation of books that aim at a wide audience inside or outside academia when it is important to capture the broader impacts of educational or cultural activities and when they cannot be manipulated in advance of the evaluation.

Can<scp>A</scp>mazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books?

CanAmazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books?