Business

Accountability

Government (linguistics)

Family medicine

Nursing

Marketing

Philosophy

Political science

Psychological intervention

Publicity

Programming language

Enforcement

Appeal

Public relations

Computer science

Linguistics

Java

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

Medicine

Environmental health

Health Policy and Planning

Background Indonesia has insufficient resources to adequately respond to the HIV/AIDS epidemic, and thus faces a great challenge in prioritizing interventions. In many countries, such priority setting processes are typically ad hoc and not transparent leading to unfair decisions. Here, we evaluated the priority setting process in HIV/AIDS control in West Java province against the four conditions of the accountability for reasonableness (A4R) framework: relevance, publicity, appeals and revision, and enforcement. Methods We reviewed government documents and conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews based on the A4R framework with 22 participants of the 5-year HIV/AIDS strategy development for 2008–13 (West Java province) and 2007–11 (Bandung). Results We found that criteria for priority setting were used implicitly and that the strategies included a wide range of programmes. Many stakeholders were involved in the process but their contribution could be improved and particularly the public and people living with HIV/AIDS could be better engaged. The use of appeal and publicity mechanisms could be more transparent and formally stated. Public regulations are not yet installed to ensure fair priority setting. Conclusions To increase fairness in HIV/AIDS priority setting, West Java should make improvements on all four conditions of the A4R framework.

Priority setting in HIV/AIDS control in West Java Indonesia: an evaluation based on the accountability for reasonableness framework