Addressing Posttreatment Selection Bias in Comparative Effectiveness Research, Using Real-World Data and Simulation

Volume: 191, Issue: 2, Pages: 331 - 340
Published: Oct 6, 2021
Abstract
To examine methodologies that address imbalanced treatment switching and censoring, 6 different analytical approaches were evaluated under a comparative effectiveness framework: intention-to-treat, as-treated, intention-to-treat with censor-weighting, as-treated with censor-weighting, time-varying exposure, and time-varying exposure with censor-weighting. Marginal structural models were employed to address time-varying exposure, confounding, and...
Paper Details
Title
Addressing Posttreatment Selection Bias in Comparative Effectiveness Research, Using Real-World Data and Simulation
Published Date
Oct 6, 2021
Volume
191
Issue
2
Pages
331 - 340
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.