Strategically reward solvers in crowdsourcing contests: the role of seeker feedback

Published on Sep 17, 2021in Behaviour & Information Technology3.086
· DOI :10.1080/0144929X.2021.1973105
Meng-Meng Wang (NUIST: Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology)
In the context of crowdsourcing contest through which seekers attempt to obtain creative solutions by tapping into the wisdom of crowds with a competition-based reward system, this study investigat...
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
#1Kimmy Wa Chan (Hong Kong Baptist University)H-Index: 13
#2Stella Yiyan Li (NAU: Northern Arizona University)H-Index: 20
Last. John Jianjun ZhuH-Index: 6
view all 4 authors...
#1Juncai Jiang (VT: Virginia Tech)H-Index: 3
#2Yu Wang (LBSU: California State University, Long Beach)H-Index: 7
Ideation contests are commonly used across public and private sectors to generate new ideas for solving problems, creating designs, and improving products or processes. In such a contest, a firm or an organization (the seeker) outsources an ideation task online to a distributed population of independent agents (solvers) in the form of an open call. Solvers compete to exert efforts and the one with the best solution wins a bounty. In evaluating solutions, the seeker typically has subjective taste...
The purpose of this paper is to explore the underlying mechanisms through which interactivity and fairness perception impart influence on solvers’ continuance intention in crowdsourcing contest settings.,On basis of self-determination theory and social exchange theory, this study focuses on the mediating roles of motivation and platform trust to explain the underlying influence processes of interactivity and fairness perception on continuance intention. A sample of 306 solvers was obtained from ...
#1Indika Dissanayake (UNCG: University of North Carolina at Greensboro)H-Index: 5
#2Nikhil Mehta (UNCG: University of North Carolina at Greensboro)H-Index: 12
Last. Kwasi Amoako-Gyampah (UNCG: University of North Carolina at Greensboro)H-Index: 21
view all 5 authors...
Abstract Advances in information technologies (IT) have enabled organizations to seek solutions for their business problems from beyond their own workforce through digital crowdsourcing platforms. In the most common form of crowdsourcing, teams that offer solutions compete for rewards. Thus, a question of interest is whether competition is a key crowdsourcing characteristic that influences how teams allocate their effort and achieve desired performance. Motivated by this question, we investigate...
#1Lian Jian (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 9
#2Sha Yang (SC: University of Southern California)H-Index: 32
Last. Li Crystal JiangH-Index: 2
view all 5 authors...
Crowdsourcing contests are contests by which organizations tap into the wisdom of crowds by outsourcing tasks to large groups of people on the Internet. In an online environment often characterized by anonymity and lack of trust, there are inherent uncertainties for participants of such contests. This study focuses on crowdsourcing contests with winner-take-all prizes. During these contests, submissions are made sequentially and contest hosts can provide public in-process feedback to the submiss...
#1Klaas-Jan Stol (UCC: University College Cork)H-Index: 22
#2Bora Caglayan (IBM)H-Index: 14
Last. Brian Fitzgerald (UL: University of Limerick)H-Index: 55
view all 3 authors...
Crowdsourcing is emerging as an alternative outsourcing strategy which is gaining increasing attention in the software engineering community. However, crowdsourcing software development involves complex tasks which differ significantly from the micro-tasks that can be found on crowdsourcing platforms such as Amazon Mechanical Turk which are much shorter in duration, are typically very simple, and do not involve any task interdependencies. To achieve the potential benefits of crowdsourcing in the...
#1Wanjiang Deng (HUST: Huazhong University of Science and Technology)H-Index: 1
#2Xu Guan (WHU: Wuhan University)H-Index: 1
Last. Shan LiuH-Index: 1
view all 4 authors...
Purpose The online crowdsourcing has been widely applied in the practice. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the all-pay auction contest in crowdsourcing, wherein a seeker posts a task online and the solvers decide whether to participate in the contest and in what extent to spend efforts on their submissions. Design/methodology/approach The authors specifically consider two classic contest formats: simultaneous contest and sequential contest, depending on whether the solver can observe ...
#1Patrick Pollok (RWTH Aachen University)H-Index: 4
#2Dirk Lüttgens (RWTH Aachen University)H-Index: 9
Last. Frank T. Piller (RWTH Aachen University)H-Index: 43
view all 3 authors...
We investigate in the context of crowdsourcing how seekers can increase open innovation performance, measured as received solver attention, by making two strategic decisions: selecting innovation tasks that are well suited for crowdsourcing and choosing between the potentials of status signalling through identity disclosure versus enjoying the benefits of anonymity. Drawing on uncertainty reduction theory, we suggest that a well-articulated problem statement reduces uncertainties of potential so...
#1Nuno CamachoH-Index: 6
#2Hyoryung NamH-Index: 4
Last. Stefan StremerschH-Index: 28
view all 4 authors...
Firms increasingly use innovation tournaments to crowdsource innovation ideas from customers. This paper uncovers antecedents and consequences of customers’ participation intensity over the course of a tournament. More specifically, the authors theorize on the effects of the type and timing of moderating feedback to tournament participants on their participation intensity, and on the effect of the latter on idea quality. Through two longitudinal experiments using a commercial innovation tourname...
#1Thomas Gillier (Grenoble School of Management)H-Index: 8
#2Cédric Chaffois (Grenoble School of Management)H-Index: 2
Last. Barry L. Bayus (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 37
view all 5 authors...
Abstract The existing literature offers conflicting advice regarding the types of task instructions that increase the quality of ideas during idea generation. Our research examines three types of task instructions: unbounded (participants are asked to generate any ideas they want), suggestive (participants are asked to propose ideas that improve current product benefits), and prohibitive (participants are asked to propose ideas that do not involve current product benefits). We explore the effect...
Cited By0
This website uses cookies.
We use cookies to improve your online experience. By continuing to use our website we assume you agree to the placement of these cookies.
To learn more, you can find in our Privacy Policy.