Comparing the reporting and conduct quality of exercise and pharmacological randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
Abstract
Objective Evaluate the quality of exercise randomised controlled trial (RCT) reporting and conduct in clinical populations (ie, adults with or at risk of chronic conditions) and compare with matched pharmacological RCTs. Design Systematic review. Data sources Embase (Elsevier), PubMed (NLM) and CINAHL (EBSCO). Study selection RCTs of exercise in clinical populations with matching pharmacological RCTs published in leading clinical, medical and...
Paper Details
Title
Comparing the reporting and conduct quality of exercise and pharmacological randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
Published Date
Aug 1, 2021
Journal
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
e048218 - e048218
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History