Efficacy comparison of chlorhexidine and iodine preparation in reduction of surgical site infection: A systemic review and meta-analysis

Published on Aug 6, 2021in International Journal of Nursing Studies3.783
· DOI :10.1016/J.IJNURSTU.2021.104059
Li Li (HMU: Harbin Medical University), Yu Wang (HMU: Harbin Medical University), Shouyan Wang (HMU: Harbin Medical University)
Source
Abstract
Abstract null null Background null Chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine are the most common disinfectants used in preoperative skin preparation. However, there is no consistent conclusion regarding the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) and bacterial culture data. null null null Objective null To assess the efficacy of chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine in the prevention of postoperative SSI and relevant bacterial data. null null null Design null Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis null null null Settings null N/A null null null Participants null N/A null null null Method null Literature relevant to “skin antisepsis” and “surgical site infections” was retrieved from PUBMED, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINHAL and CNKI. The incidence of SSI was the primary outcome, while the secondary outcome was bacterial data from the infected incision. All data were analyzed with Revman 5.3 and Stata Statistical Software. null null null Results null A total of 36 studies were identified in this study, which included 16,872 participants. This study revealed that chlorhexidine is superior to povidone-iodine in the prevention of postoperative SSI (risk ratio [RR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61–0.87; p = 0.019, I2 = 39%). Further meta-regression analysis revealed that the effect of chlorhexidine was directly associated with the type of incision, but failed to differentiate between the subgroups divided according to the type of incision. With respect to bacteria colonization, the most common bacteria for chlorhexidine arm were propionibacterium's, while the most common bacteria for the iodine arm were staphylococci species. null null null Conclusion null In comparison to povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine showed better results in preventing postoperative SSI.
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
20211.88Trials
6 Authors (Luwang Al, ..., Vikas Gautam)
11 Citations
References53
Newest
#1Uri P. Dior (Royal Women's Hospital)H-Index: 8
#2Shamitha Kathurusinghe (Royal Women's Hospital)H-Index: 1
Last. Martin Healey (University of Melbourne)H-Index: 16
view all 7 authors...
Importance Gynecological laparoscopies are one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide. Limited evidence exists on rates of surgical site infections in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopies and strategies to prevent these infections. Objective To compare rates of port-site infections, organ or space infections, and any type of surgical site infections among patients who underwent gynecological laparoscopies and received 1 of 3 types of skin preparation solutions. Design, Setti...
2 CitationsSource
#1Shi ChenH-Index: 1
#2Jun Wu ChenH-Index: 1
Last. Chun Cheng XuH-Index: 1
view all 4 authors...
Chlorhexidine (CH) and povidone-iodine (PI) are the most commonly used preoperative skin antiseptics at present. However, the prevention of the surgical site infection (SSI) and the incidence of skin adverse events do not reach a consistent statement and conclusion. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine in the prevention of postoperative surgical site infection and the incidence of corresponding skin adverse events. Substantial studies related to ...
10 CitationsSource
#1Benedikt Ritter (Augsburg College)H-Index: 1
#2Philipp Herlyn (University of Rostock)H-Index: 9
Last. Anica Herlyn (University of Rostock)H-Index: 3
view all 4 authors...
Background For the prevention of surgical wound infections (SSIs), local microorganism counts can be lowered by skin antisepsis prior to surgical incisions. Until now, it has been unclear which antiseptic is the most effective. Methods This prospective randomized trial analyzed the efficacy of 2 frequently used agents in the reduction of postoperative wound complication rates after aseptic trauma surgery on the lower leg and foot. In the study, 279 consecutive participants were randomized; 112 r...
5 CitationsSource
#1Sener Gezer (Kocaeli University)
#2Hayriye M. Yalvaç (Kocaeli University)
Last. İzzet Yücesoy (Kocaeli University)H-Index: 10
view all 4 authors...
Abstract Objectives To compare povidone-iodine with chlorhexidine alcohol solutions for the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) in malignant and premalignant gynaecologic diseases, and to evaluate the effects of temperature on SSI at 25 °C and 37 °C. Study design This was a randomized controlled trial of a cohort of 220 patients undergoing surgery for malignant or premalignant conditions. Preoperative skin preparations were performed with 10% povidone-iodine at 25 °C (PI), 10% povidone-i...
1 CitationsSource
#1Miranda Cumpston (University of Newcastle)H-Index: 7
#2Tianjing Li (Johns Hopkins University)H-Index: 33
Last. James Thomas (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 57
view all 7 authors...
781 CitationsSource
#1Trisha Peel (Monash University)H-Index: 22
#2Michelle M. Dowsey (University of Melbourne)H-Index: 30
Last. Peter F. M. Choong (University of Melbourne)H-Index: 81
view all 5 authors...
Abstract Objectives Surgical site skin preparation is an effective method to prevent wound complications. The optimal agent has not been established, and guidelines contain conflicting recommendations. Methods The aim of alcoholic chlorhexidine or alcoholic iodine skin antisepsis (ACAISA) was to assess the efficacy of surgical site skin preparation with 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate (w/v) in 70% ethanol (v/v) to 1% iodine (w/v) in 70% ethanol (v/v). This was a cluster randomized, controlled, sing...
11 CitationsSource
Application of antiseptic products to the skin plays an important role in prevention of a variety of health care–associated infections. Preoperative bathing or showering is widely recommended to reduce the risk of surgical site infections. Evidence of the impact of this measure on surgical site infection rates is mixed, and further prospective trials comparing standardized protocols for showering with plain soap or chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-containing soap, or bathing with 2% CHG-impregnated...
7 CitationsSource
#1A. Charehbili (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 13
#2M. B. G. KoekH-Index: 1
Last. Rutger-Jan SwijnenburgH-Index: 25
view all 16 authors...
Background: Surgical-site infection (SSI) is a serious surgical complication that can be prevented by preoperative skin disinfection. In Western European countries, preoperative disinfection is commonly performed with either chlorhexidine or iodine in an alcohol-based solution. This study aimed to investigate whether there is superiority of chlorhexidine-alcohol over iodine-alcohol for preventing SSI. Methods: This prospective cluster-randomized crossover trial was conducted in five teaching hos...
2 CitationsSource
20 Citations
#1Robert G. Sawyer (WMU: Western Michigan University)H-Index: 66
#2Heather L. Evans (UW: University of Washington)H-Index: 31
7 CitationsSource
Cited By0
Newest