Sex Differences in Academic Productivity Across Academic Ranks and Specialties in Academic Medicine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Published on Jun 1, 2021
· DOI :10.1001/JAMANETWORKOPEN.2021.12404
Ming Wang16
Estimated H-index: 16
(Penn State Cancer Institute)
Importance Despite equal numbers of men and women entering medical school, women are underrepresented in the upper echelons of academic medicine and receive less compensation and research funding. Citation-related publication productivity metrics, such as the h-index, are increasingly used for hiring, salary, grants, retention, promotion, and tenure decisions. Exploring sex differences in these metrics across academic medicine provides deeper insight into why differences are observed in career outcomes. Objective To systematically examine the available literature on sex differences in h-index of academic faculty physicians across all medical specialties and all levels of academic rank. Data Sources Medical literature with the term h-index found in PubMed and published between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2018, was used. Study Selection A PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes), PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses), and MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) selection protocol was used to find observational studies that published h-indexes for faculty physicians that were stratified by sex. Studies were excluded if they were review articles, retracted, or unavailable online. Ultimately, 14 of 786 studies (1.78%) met the inclusion criteria. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data from 9 studies across 16 specialties were examined using weighted random-effects meta-analyses. Five studies were excluded because of overlapping specialties with another study or because they were missing appropriate statistics for the meta-analysis. Four of these studies were included in qualitative synthesis to bring the total to 13 studies. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary study outcome was the h-index. Results The meta-analysis included 10 665 North American unique academic physicians across 9 different studies from the years 2009 to 2018. Of the 10 665 physicians, 2655 (24.89%) were women. Summary effect sizes for mean h-indexes of men and women and mean h-index difference between men and women were determined for all faculty physicians and at each academic rank. Overall, female faculty had lower h-indexes than male faculty (mean difference, -4.09; 95% CI, -5.44 to -2.73; P < .001). When adjusting for academic rank, female faculty still had lower h-indexes than male faculty at the ranks of assistant professor (mean difference, -1.3; 95% CI, -1.90 to -0.72; P < .001), associate professor (mean difference, -2.09; 95% CI, -3.40 to -0.78; P = .002), and professor (mean difference, -3.41; 95% CI, -6.24 to -0.58; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review and meta-analysis, women had lower h-indexes than men across most specialties and at all academic ranks, but it is unclear why these differences exist. These findings suggest that future investigation should be conducted regarding the causes of lower h-indexes in women and that interventions should be developed to provide a more equitable environment for all physicians regardless of sex.
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
#1Linda H. Chaudron (UR: University of Rochester)H-Index: 22
#2Elizabeth Anson (UR: University of Rochester)H-Index: 17
Last. Catherine Cerulli (UR: University of Rochester)H-Index: 26
view all 5 authors...
Background: A gender gap in leadership exists in academic medicine. Medical school faculty rosters indicate an overrepresentation of women in entry-level positions. As positions increase in seniority and leadership responsibilities, there is an underrepresentation of women. The reasons for this discrepancy are not fully understood, but the mid-career transition is one career point that some scholars hypothesize is part of the leaky pipeline. The University of Rochester Medical Center developed a...
#1Kimber P. Richter (KU: University of Kansas)H-Index: 33
#2Lauren Clark (KU: University of Kansas)H-Index: 2
Last. Robert D. Simari (KU: University of Kansas)H-Index: 64
view all 9 authors...
Abstract Background In 2000, a landmark study showed that women who graduated from U.S. medical schools from 1979 through 1997 were less likely than their male counterparts to be promoted to upper ...
#1Nicholas C. Oleck (RU: Rutgers University)H-Index: 5
#2Zachary S. Gala (RU: Rutgers University)H-Index: 1
Last. Edward S. Lee (RU: Rutgers University)H-Index: 19
view all 7 authors...
Background The academic productivity of an integrated plastic surgery applicant is strongly considered during the ranking process but is often difficult to assess. The h-index is a tool that provides an objective measure of both the quality and impact of an author's academic works. The goals of this study were to assess whether the h-index of recently matched plastic surgery interns correlates with their home and eventual residency program characteristics. Methods A database of all 2018 interns ...
#1Jens Peter Andersen (AU: Aarhus University)H-Index: 9
#2Mathias Wullum Nielsen (UCPH: University of Copenhagen)H-Index: 13
Last. Reshma Jagsi (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 79
view all 5 authors...
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in school closures and distancing requirements that have disrupted both work and family life for many. Concerns exist that these disruptions caused by the pandemic may not have influenced men and women researchers equally. Many medical journals have published papers on the pandemic, which were generated by researchers facing the challenges of these disruptions. Here we report the results of an analysis that compared the gender distribution of authors on 1,893 m...
#1Narjust Duma (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 10
#1Anita Raj (UCSD: University of California, San Diego)H-Index: 72
#2Karen M. Freund (Tufts University)H-Index: 51
Last. Phyllis L. Carr (Harvard University)H-Index: 32
view all 4 authors...
Abstract Background Sexual harassment of women in academic medicine may impede advancement and productivity. This study analyzes the longitudinal effects of sexual harassment on academic advancement and productivity among women. Methods We undertook a longitudinal analysis to predict effects of sexual harassment reported in 1995 on career outcomes measured in 2012–13, among a sample of women in academic medicine (N = 1273) recruited from 24 U.S. medical schools. Measures included survey data fro...
#1Matthew Carnevale (Montefiore Medical Center)H-Index: 4
#2John Phair (Mount Sinai Hospital)H-Index: 3
Last. Issam Koleilat (Montefiore Medical Center)H-Index: 7
view all 6 authors...
Abstract Objective Previous studies have identified significant gender discrepancies in grant funding, leadership positions, and publication impact in surgical subspecialties. We investigated whether these discrepancies were also present in academic vascular surgery. Methods Academic websites from institutions with vascular surgery training programs were queried to identify academic faculty, and leadership positions were noted. H-index, number of citations, and total number of publications were ...
#1Irbaz Bin Riaz (Mayo Clinic)H-Index: 22
#2Rabbia Siddiqi (DUHS: Dow University of Health Sciences)H-Index: 8
Last. Faisal Khosa (Vancouver General Hospital)H-Index: 29
view all 13 authors...
PURPOSE:Gender disparity persists in academic medicine. Female faculty are underrepresented in leadership positions and have lower research output. We studied gender differences in faculty rank and...
#1Marc J. Lerchenmueller (Yale University)H-Index: 5
#2Olav Sorenson (Yale University)H-Index: 54
Last. Anupam B. Jena (Harvard University)H-Index: 51
view all 3 authors...
Abstract Objectives Women remain underrepresented on faculties of medicine and the life sciences more broadly. Whether gender differences in self presentation of clinical research exist and may contribute to this gender gap has been challenging to explore empirically. The objective of this study was to analyze whether men and women differ in how positively they frame their research findings and to analyze whether the positive framing of research is associated with higher downstream citations. De...
#1Reshma Jagsi (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 79
#2Julie K. Silver (Harvard University)H-Index: 32
Cited By1
#1Ze Yang (Tianjin Medical University)H-Index: 1
#2Huanyu Liu (Tianjin Medical University)
Last. Naijun Tang (Tianjin Medical University)H-Index: 14
view all 7 authors...
Abstract null null Although previous meta-analyses have shown that prenatal PFASs exposure is associated with reduction in birth weight, effects of prenatal PFASs exposure on birth outcomes have not been fully explored. We conducted a meta-analysis of 23 eligible studies searched from Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science before March 21, 2021 to analyze the association between prenatal PFASs exposure and birth outcomes, including premature birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), small for gestational...
#1Grace Huang (Harvard University)H-Index: 25
#2Julie K. Silver (Harvard University)H-Index: 32
This website uses cookies.
We use cookies to improve your online experience. By continuing to use our website we assume you agree to the placement of these cookies.
To learn more, you can find in our Privacy Policy.