Quality appraisal of systematic reviews of interventions for children with cerebral palsy reveals critically low confidence
Volume: 63, Issue: 11, Pages: 1316 - 1326
Published: Jun 6, 2021
Abstract
To evaluate the methodological quality of recent systematic reviews of interventions for children with cerebral palsy in order to determine the level of confidence in the reviews' conclusions.A comprehensive search of 22 databases identified eligible systematic reviews with and without meta-analysis published worldwide from 2015 to 2019. We independently extracted data and used A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2) to...
Paper Details
Title
Quality appraisal of systematic reviews of interventions for children with cerebral palsy reveals critically low confidence
Published Date
Jun 6, 2021
Volume
63
Issue
11
Pages
1316 - 1326
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History