When nomenclature matters: is the “new paradigm” really a new paradigm for the psychology of reasoning?
Abstract
For most of its history, the psychology of reasoning was dominated by binary extensional logic. The so-called “new paradigm” instead puts subjective degrees of belief center stage, often represented as probabilities. We argue that the “new paradigm” is too vaguely defined and therefore does not allow a clear decision about what falls within its scope and what does not. We also show that there was not one settled theoretical “old” paradigm,...
Paper Details
Title
When nomenclature matters: is the “new paradigm” really a new paradigm for the psychology of reasoning?
Published Date
Oct 19, 2021
Journal
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
341 - 370
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History