Contagious endowment effects across transactions

Published on May 6, 2021in European Journal of Marketing
· DOI :10.1108/EJM-11-2019-0855
Tae-Hyung Pyo2
Estimated H-index: 2
JaeHwan Kwon5
Estimated H-index: 5
+ 1 AuthorsDhananjay Nayakankuppam9
Estimated H-index: 9
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
3 Citations
7 Citations
3 Citations
#1Ori Heffetz (Cornell University)H-Index: 14
#2John A. List (U of C: University of Chicago)H-Index: 108
A hallmark result within behavioral economics is that individuals' choices are affected by current endowments. A recent theory due to Kőszegi and Rabin (2006, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 1133–1165) explains such endowment effect with a model of expectations-based reference-dependent preferences. Departing from past work, we conduct complementary experiments to disentangle expectations—verified probabilistic beliefs held by subjects—from other features of endowment—such as “assignment” t...
43 CitationsSource
#1Ray Weaver (Harvard University)H-Index: 3
#2Shane Frederick (Yale University)H-Index: 27
Abstract The common finding that selling prices exceed buying prices (the so-called endowment effect) is typically explained by the assumptions that consumers evaluate potential transactions with respect to their current holdings and that the owners of a good regard its potential loss to be more significant than nonowners regard its potential acquisition. In contrast to this “pain-of-losing” account, the authors propose that the endowment effect reflects a reluctance to trade on terms that appea...
84 CitationsSource
#1Suzanne B. Shu (UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles)H-Index: 13
#2Joann Peck (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 19
This research proposes that the concept of emotional attachment, and specifically the independent constructs of psychological ownership and affective reaction, can help explain many of the endowment effect findings documented in the literature. We define these constructs and then test them across a set of nine studies in which we both replicate previous and generate new endowment effect findings, and then show that psychological ownership and affective reaction can mediate the effects. In doing ...
157 CitationsSource
#1Paulo Goes (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 23
#2Gilbert G. Karuga (KU: University of Kansas)H-Index: 10
Last. Arvind Tripathi (UW: University of Washington)H-Index: 12
view all 3 authors...
A growing number of vendors are using a sequence of online auctions to sell large inventories of identical items. Although bidding strategies and bidder behavior in single auctions have been extensively studied, limited research exists on bidding in sequential auctions. We seek to explain how bidders in such an environment learn from the information, and form and update their willingness to pay (WTP). Using a large data set from an online auction retailer, we analyze the evolution of the bidders...
60 CitationsSource
#1Carey K. Morewedge (CMU: Carnegie Mellon University)H-Index: 27
#2Lisa L. Shu (Harvard University)H-Index: 11
Last. Timothy D. Wilson (UVA: University of Virginia)H-Index: 79
view all 4 authors...
People typically demand more to relinquish the goods they own than they would be willing to pay to acquire those goods if they did not already own them (the endowment effect). The standard economic explanation of this phenomenon is that people expect the pain of relinquishing a good to be greater than the pleasure of acquiring it (the loss aversion account). The standard psychological explanation is that people are reluctant to relinquish the goods they own simply because they associate those go...
344 CitationsSource
#1Joann Peck (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 19
#2Suzanne B. Shu (UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles)H-Index: 13
This research finds that merely touching an object results in an increase in perceived ownership of that object. For nonowners, or buyers, perceived ownership can be increased with either mere touch or with imagery encouraging touch. Perceived ownership can also be increased through touch for legal owners, or sellers of an object. We also explore valuation of an object and conclude that it is jointly influenced by both perceived ownership and by the valence of the touch experience. We discuss th...
623 CitationsSource
#1Eric Johnson (Columbia University)H-Index: 97
#2Gerald Häubl (U of A: University of Alberta)H-Index: 30
Last. Anat Keinan (Columbia University)H-Index: 12
view all 3 authors...
How do people judge the monetary value of objects? One clue is provided by the typical endowment study (D. Kahneman, J. L. Knetsch, & R. H. Thaler, 1991), in which participants are randomly given either a good, such as a coffee mug, that they may later sell ("sellers") or a choice between the good and amounts of cash ("choosers"). Sellers typically demand at least twice as much as choosers, inconsistent with economic theory. This result is usually explained by an increased weighting of losses, o...
286 CitationsSource
#1Gail Tom (CSUS: California State University, Sacramento)H-Index: 15
#2Stephanie Lopez (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 1
Last. Kivilcim Demir (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
This article reports on a study comparing the effect of the retail and direct marketing channels of delivery on the endowment effect. The results demonstrated the endowment effect for both retail and direct marketing channels of product delivery. In addition, in the direct marketing channel, the endowment effect was strengthened by the physical, tangible possession of products at the point of product receipt compared to its virtual possession value at the point of purchase. In the retail channel...
8 CitationsSource
#1Dhananjay Nayakankuppam (UI: University of Iowa)H-Index: 9
#2Himanshu Mishra (UI: University of Iowa)H-Index: 12
The endowment effect, predicted by prospect theory, is a robust finding in behavioral decision theory. Extending recent examinations of the underlying processes, we present evidence for differential perceptions of the traded item, with sellers focusing more on positive features and less on negative features, relative to buyers. In experiment 1, sellers and buyers access information of differing valence in a free recall task. Experiment 2 utilizes error rates and response latencies to demonstrate...
147 CitationsSource
#1Itamar Simonson (Stanford University)H-Index: 53
#2Aimee Drolet (UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles)H-Index: 22
We examine the susceptibility of consumers' willingness-to-pay (WTP) and willingness-to-accept (WTA) judgments to influence by arbitrary anchors. The results of four studies suggest that, although circumstantial differences between buying and selling decisions can lead to systematic differences in susceptibility to anchoring effects, the principles governing the impact of anchoring on WTP and WTA judgments are essentially the same. In particular, robust anchoring effects are observed when the an...
183 CitationsSource
Cited By0