Programming language

Context (archaeology)

Robot

Criminal justice

Artificial intelligence

Criminology

Biology

Political science

Operating system

Computer science

Process (computing)

Economic Justice

Sociology

Adjudication

Recidivism

Judicial opinion

Paleontology

Software

Asian Journal of Law and Society

The paths to digital justice focus on the challenges of contemporary digital societies in reaching automated decision-making processes through software, algorithms, and information technology without loss of its human quality and the guarantees of due process. In this context, this article reflects on the possibilities of establishing judicial robots in substitution for human judges, by examining whether artificial intelligence and algorithms may support judicial decision-making independently and without human supervision. The point of departure for this analysis comes from the experience of criminal justice systems with software for judgment of the possibility of recidivism of criminal defendants. Algorithmic decision-making may improve the public good in support of judicial decision-making, but the analysis of current technology and our standards for due process of law recommends caution on the conclusion that robots may replace human judges and satisfy our expectations for explainability and fairness in adjudication.

Paths to Digital Justice: Judicial Robots, Algorithmic Decision-Making, and Due Process