Philosophy

Artificial intelligence

Feature (linguistics)

Naive Bayes classifier

k-nearest neighbors algorithm

Pattern recognition (psychology)

Image (mathematics)

Random forest

Computer science

Scale-invariant feature transform

Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition

Support vector machine

3D single-object recognition

Linguistics

Feature extraction

Dimensionality reduction

Orb (optics)

Multimedia Tools and Applications

Object recognition is a key research area in the field of image processing and computer vision, which recognizes the object in an image and provides a proper label. In the paper, three popular feature descriptor algorithms that are Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), Speeded Up Robust Feature (SURF) and Oriented Fast and Rotated BRIEF (ORB) are used for experimental work of an object recognition system. A comparison among these three descriptors is exhibited in the paper by determining them individually and with different combinations of these three methodologies. The amount of the features extracted using these feature extraction methods are further reduced using a feature selection (k-means clustering) and a dimensionality reduction method (Locality Preserving Projection). Various classifiers i.e. K-Nearest Neighbor, Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, and Random Forest are used to classify objects based on their similarity. The focus of this article is to present a study of the performance comparison among these three feature extraction methods, particularly when their combination derives in recognizing the object more efficiently. In this paper, the authors have presented a comparative analysis view among various feature descriptors algorithms and classification models for 2D object recognition. The Caltech-101 public dataset is considered in this article for experimental work. The experiment reveals that a hybridization of SIFT, SURF and ORB method with Random Forest classification model accomplishes the best results as compared to other state-of-the-art work. The comparative analysis has been presented in terms of recognition accuracy, True Positive Rate (TPR), False Positive Rate (FPR), and Area Under Curve (AUC) parameters.

2D object recognition: a comparative analysis of SIFT, SURF and ORB feature descriptors