Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: multicentre analysis.

Published on Mar 12, 2021in British Journal of Surgery5.676
· DOI :10.1093/BJS/ZNAA039
S. Lof6
Estimated H-index: 6
(University of Southampton),
N van der Heijde (UvA: University of Amsterdam)+ 28 AuthorsU Wellner
BACKGROUND The role of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is still unclear, and whether robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) offers benefits over laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is unknown because large multicentre studies are lacking. This study compared perioperative outcomes between RDP and LDP. METHODS A multicentre international propensity score-matched study included patients who underwent RDP or LDP for any indication in 21 European centres from six countries that performed at least 15 distal pancreatectomies annually (January 2011 to June 2019). Propensity score matching was based on preoperative characteristics in a 1 : 1 ratio. The primary outcome was the major morbidity rate (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or above). RESULTS A total of 1551 patients (407 RDP and 1144 LDP) were included in the study. Some 402 patients who had RDP were matched with 402 who underwent LDP. After matching, there was no difference between RDP and LDP groups in rates of major morbidity (14.2 versus 16.5 per cent respectively; P = 0.378), postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (24.6 versus 26.5 per cent; P = 0.543) or 90-day mortality (0.5 versus 1.3 per cent; P = 0.268). RDP was associated with a longer duration of surgery than LDP (median 285 (i.q.r. 225-350) versus 240 (195-300) min respectively; P < 0.001), lower conversion rate (6.7 versus 15.2 per cent; P < 0.001), higher spleen preservation rate (81.4 versus 62.9 per cent; P = 0.001), longer hospital stay (median 8.5 (i.q.r. 7-12) versus 7 (6-10) days; P < 0.001) and lower readmission rate (11.0 versus 18.2 per cent; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION The major morbidity rate was comparable between RDP and LDP. RDP was associated with improved rates of conversion, spleen preservation and readmission, to the detriment of longer duration of surgery and hospital stay.
BACKGROUND: This study analyzed the Quality of Life (QoL) and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic (LDP) versus robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP). METHOD: All patients who underwent LDP or RDP from 2011 to 2017 and with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 12 months were included in the study. To minimize bias, a propensity score-matched analysis (1:2) was performed. Two different questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D) were completed by the patients. The mean differential cost and mean differe...
10 CitationsSource
#1Bergthor Björnsson (Linköping University)H-Index: 16
#2A. Lindhoff Larsson (Linköping University)H-Index: 2
Last. Per Sandström (Linköping University)H-Index: 32
view all 5 authors...
BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is advantageous compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) regarding hospital stay, blood loss and recovery. Only one randomized study is available, which showed enhanced functional recovery after LDP compared with ODP. METHODS: Consecutive patients evaluated at a multidisciplinary tumour board and planned for standard distal pancreatectomy were randomized prospectively to LDP or ODP in an unblinded, parallel-gr...
25 CitationsSource
#1Sarang Hong (UOU: University of Ulsan)H-Index: 4
#2Ki Byung Song (UOU: University of Ulsan)H-Index: 21
Last. Song Cheol Kim (UOU: University of Ulsan)H-Index: 30
view all 14 authors...
Background Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has gained popularity for the treatment of left-sided pancreatic tumors. Robotic systems represent the most recent advancement in minimally invasive surgical treatment for such tumors. Theoretically, robotic systems are considered to have several advantages over laparoscopic systems. However, there have been few studies comparing both systems in the treatment of distal pancreatectomy. We compared perioperative and oncological outcomes between t...
12 CitationsSource
#1A. Moekotte (University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust)H-Index: 6
#2S. Lof (University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust)H-Index: 6
Last. Mohammed Abu Hilal (University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust)H-Index: 26
view all 13 authors...
Background The laparoscopic approach in distal pancreatectomy is associated with higher rates of splenic preservation compared to open surgery. Although favorable postoperative short-term outcomes have been reported in open spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy when compared to distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, it is unclear whether this observation applies to the laparoscopic approach. The aim of this study is to compare laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) with ...
6 CitationsSource
AIM: There is no study in the literature that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) over laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). We performed a comparative study of RDP and LDP with the aim of evaluating clinical and cost-effective outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is an observational, comparative prospective nonrandomized study. The primary end point was to compare the cost-effectiveness differences between both groups. A willingness to pay of euro20 000 a...
3 CitationsSource
#1Sergio Alfieri (UCSC: Catholic University of the Sacred Heart)H-Index: 23
#2Ugo BoggiH-Index: 63
Last. Giuseppe Quero (UCSC: Catholic University of the Sacred Heart)H-Index: 13
view all 20 authors...
Introduction. Despite the widespread use of the robotic technology, only a few studies with small sample sizes report its application to pancreatic diseases treatment. Our aim is to present the res...
10 CitationsSource
#1S. Lof (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 6
#1Sanne Lof (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 3
Last. Mohammed Abu Hilal (University of Southampton)H-Index: 26
view all 15 authors...
Objective:The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of conversion during minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) on outcome by a propensity-matched comparison with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP).Background:MIDP is associated with faster
4 CitationsSource
#1S. Lof (University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust)H-Index: 6
#1Sanne Lof (University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust)H-Index: 3
Last. M. Abu Hilal (University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust)H-Index: 17
view all 15 authors...
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is increasingly being performed as an alternative to open surgery. Whether the implementation and corresponding learning curve of LDP have an impact on patient outcome is unknown. The aim was to investigate the temporal trends in practice across UK centres. RESULTADOS: En total, se incluyeron 570 pacientes con LDP y 888 con reseccion abierta. Para el LDP, la mediana de tiempo operatorio fue de 240 minutos con 200 ml de perdida de sangre. La ta...
14 CitationsSource
#1William B. Lyman (Carolinas Medical Center)H-Index: 4
#2Michael Passeri (Carolinas Medical Center)H-Index: 7
Last. John B. Martinie (Carolinas Medical Center)H-Index: 22
view all 8 authors...
Introduction While minimally invasive left pancreatectomy has become more widespread and generally accepted over the last decade, opinions on modality of minimally invasive approach (robotic or laparoscopic) remain mixed with few institutions performing a significant portion of both operative approaches simultaneously.
18 CitationsSource
#1Sivesh K. Kamarajah (Freeman Hospital)H-Index: 16
#2Nathania Sutandi (Freeman Hospital)H-Index: 1
Last. Steven A. White (Freeman Hospital)H-Index: 28
view all 5 authors...
Abstract Background Robotic surgery offers theoretical advantages to conventional laparoscopic surgery including improved instrument dexterity, 3D visualization and better ergonomics. This review aimed to determine if these theoretical advantages translate into improved patient outcomes in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy through laparoscopic (LDP) or robotic (RDP) approaches. Method A systematic literature search was conducted for studies reporting minimally invasive surgery for distal...
24 CitationsSource
Cited By0