Physics

Mathematical optimization

Hamiltonian (control theory)

Cluster (spacecraft)

Political science

Unitary transformation

Coupled cluster

Programming language

Geometry

Symmetry (geometry)

Molecule

Theoretical physics

Mathematics

Mathematical physics

Computer science

Quantum mechanics

Unitary state

Excitation

Quantum

Variational principle

Hermitian matrix

Unitary matrix

The Journal of Chemical Physics

There have been assertions in the literature that the variational and unitary forms of coupled cluster theory lead to the same energy functional. Numerical evidence from previous authors was inconsistent with this claim, yet the small energy differences found between the two methods and the relatively large number of variational parameters precluded an unequivocal conclusion. Using the Lipkin Hamiltonian, we here present conclusive numerical evidence that the two theories yield different energies. The ambiguities arising from the size of the cluster parameter space are absent in the Lipkin model, particularly when truncating to double excitations. We show that in the symmetry adapted basis under strong correlation, the differences between the variational and unitary models are large, whereas they yield quite similar energies in the weakly correlated regime previously explored. We also provide a qualitative argument rationalizing why these two models cannot be the same. Additionally, we study a generalized non-unitary and non-hermitian variant that contains excitation, de-excitation, and mixed operators with different amplitudes and show that it works best when compared to the traditional, variational, unitary, and extended forms of coupled cluster doubles theories.

On the difference between variational and unitary coupled cluster theories