Secondary School Leaving Examinations: The Impact of Expectancies, Values, and Dimensional Comparisons on Male and Female Students’ Science-Oriented Choices

Published on Oct 30, 2020in Frontiers in Education
· DOI :10.3389/FEDUC.2020.545608
Nele Kampa3
Estimated H-index: 3
(CAU: University of Kiel),
Sonja Krämer1
Estimated H-index: 1
(CAU: University of Kiel),
Bettina Hannover22
Estimated H-index: 22
(FU: Free University of Berlin)
Sources
Abstract
In Germany, secondary school students have to choose at least one STEM subject (mathematics, biology, chemistry, physics) for their Secondary School Leaving Examinations. In a representative sample of students in grade 13 in one federal state in Germany, we explore boys’ and girls' subject choices in an expectancy-value framework by considering students’ prior performance, ability self-concept, and values in the chosen subject. We extend previous research by including dimensional comparisons that students make between the varying subjects they have to choose from. We discriminate between two opposing groups. One group shows a science-avoidance choice pattern by selecting only one science subject: biology (n = 439). The other group shows a science-oriented choice pattern by selecting physics or chemistry or two STEM subjects of which one was at least physics or chemistry (n = 248). We measured achievement test scores, relative and absolute midterm grades, ability self-concepts as well as attainment and utility values in chosen and non-chosen subjects and calculated logistic regressions as well as multigroup models. Our results showed that science-oriented final exam choices depended highly on ability self-concept in mathematics for boys and girls and on the relative mathematics-English midterm grade for boys. When controlling for the other predictors, attainment and utility values seemed to be irrelevant for science-oriented final exam subject choice. Our findings raise the question whether boys and girls should be encouraged differently in order to stay in the STEM pipeline and how structural conditions may shape pathways into or out of this pipeline.
References55
Newest
#1Jens Möller (CAU: University of Kiel)H-Index: 38
#2Steffen Zitzmann (CAU: University of Kiel)H-Index: 8
Last. Fabian Wolff (CAU: University of Kiel)H-Index: 7
view all 5 authors...
According to the internal/external frame of reference model, academic achievement has a strong impact on people’s self-concept, both within and between subjects. We conducted a series of meta-analy...
16 CitationsSource
#1Silke LuttenbergerH-Index: 6
#2Manuela Paechter (University of Graz)H-Index: 15
Last. Bernhard ErtlH-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
The proportion of women enrolled in STEM courses at university level has remained consistently low for decades. Differences however exist between various STEM domains: While engineering and technology appear especially unattractive, subjects such as mathematics, biology, or chemistry have better chances at attracting women. Research has mostly neglected these differences, treating STEM as an overall category. In the light of the differences in the proportions of women enrolled in and dropping ou...
6 CitationsSource
#1Rebecca LazaridesH-Index: 10
#2Fani Lauermann (Technical University of Dortmund)H-Index: 11
Women are often underrepresented in math-intensive fields like science, technology, engineering and mathematics. By comparison, boys relative to girls are less likely to strive for jobs in social and human services domains. Relatively few studies have considered that intra-individual comparisons across domains may contribute to gendered occupational choices. This study examines whether girls’ and boys’ motivational beliefs in mathematics and language arts are predictive of their career plans in ...
9 CitationsSource
#1Ming-Te Wang (University of Pittsburgh)H-Index: 36
#2Feifei Ye (University of Pittsburgh)H-Index: 5
Last. Jessica L. Degol (PSU: Pennsylvania State University)H-Index: 10
view all 3 authors...
Career aspirations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) are formulated in adolescence, making the high school years a critical time period for identifying the cognitive and motivational factors that increase the likelihood of future STEM employment. While past research has mainly focused on absolute cognitive ability levels in math and verbal domains, the current study tested whether relative cognitive strengths and interests in math, science, and verbal domains in high sc...
21 CitationsSource
#1Jiesi Guo (ACU: Australian Catholic University)H-Index: 18
#2Herbert W. Marsh (KSU: King Saud University)H-Index: 186
Last. Theresa Dicke (ACU: Australian Catholic University)H-Index: 18
view all 5 authors...
Abstract Based on TIMSS data (18,047 Grade 8 students from the four OECD countries that collected data for multiple science domains), this study integrated dimensional comparison theory and expectancy-value theory and tested predictions about how self-concept and value are related to achievement and coursework aspirations across four science domains (physics, chemistry, earth science, and biology). First, strong support for social comparisons suggested that high achievement in a particular domai...
62 CitationsSource
#1Lara Perez-Felkner (FSU: Florida State University)H-Index: 7
#2Samantha Nix (FSU: Florida State University)H-Index: 5
Last. Kirby Thomas (FSU: Florida State University)H-Index: 3
view all 3 authors...
Do mathematics ability beliefs explain gender gaps in the physical science, engineering, mathematics, and computer science fields (PEMC) and other science fields? We leverage U.S. longitudinal, nationally representative data to estimate gendered differences in girls’ and boys’ perceptions of mathematics ability with the most difficult or challenging material. Our analyses examine the potentially interacting effects of gender and these ability beliefs on students’ pathways to scientific careers. ...
25 CitationsSource
#1Tracey-Ann Palmer (UTS: University of Technology, Sydney)H-Index: 1
#2Paul F. Burke (UTS: University of Technology, Sydney)H-Index: 16
Last. Peter Aubusson (UTS: University of Technology, Sydney)H-Index: 23
view all 3 authors...
ABSTRACTStudent study of science at school has been linked to the need to provide a scientifically capable workforce and a scientifically literate society. Educators, scientists, and policymakers are concerned that too few students are choosing science for study in their final years of school. How and why students choose and reject certain subjects, including science, at this time is unclear. A Best–Worst Scaling (BWS) survey was completed by 333 Year 10 (age 14–17) students to investigate the r...
31 CitationsSource
#1Hanna Gaspard (University of Tübingen)H-Index: 11
#2Isabelle Häfner (University of Tübingen)H-Index: 8
Last. Benjamin Nagengast (University of Tübingen)H-Index: 41
view all 5 authors...
Abstract Students’ value beliefs tend to decrease across secondary school (Wigfield et al., 2015). However, previous studies did not differentiate between all the dimensions of task values defined by expectancy-value theory (Eccles et al., 1983). Therefore, this study evaluated an instrument for assessing multiple value dimensions across grade level and academic subjects and tested for differences between grade levels in these subjects. A total of 830 students from Grades 5 to 12 completed a que...
62 CitationsSource
#1Susan M. Brookhart (Duquesne University)H-Index: 32
#2Thomas R. Guskey (UK: University of Kentucky)H-Index: 47
Last. Megan E. Welsh (UC Davis: University of California, Davis)H-Index: 14
view all 8 authors...
Grading refers to the symbols assigned to individual pieces of student work or to composite measures of student performance on report cards. This review of over 100 years of research on grading considers five types of studies: (a) early studies of the reliability of grades, (b) quantitative studies of the composition of K–12 report card grades, (c) survey and interview studies of teachers’ perceptions of grades, (d) studies of standards-based grading, and (e) grading in higher education. Early 2...
86 CitationsSource
#1Friederike Helm (CAU: University of Kiel)H-Index: 10
#2Hanno Mueller-Kalthoff (CAU: University of Kiel)H-Index: 1
Last. Jens Möller (CAU: University of Kiel)H-Index: 38
view all 4 authors...
Dimensional comparison theory (DCT) defines dimensional comparisons as intraindividual comparisons that a person draws between his or her own achievements in two domains or subjects. DCT assumes that dimensional comparisons influence students’ academic self-concepts, causing stronger self-concept differences between subjects perceived as dissimilar, such as math and English, than between subjects perceived as more similar, like math and physics. However, there have been no experimental studies t...
28 CitationsSource
Cited By0
Newest