Best-worst scaling identified adequate statistical methods and literature search as the most important items of AMSTAR2 (A measurement tool to assess systematic reviews)

Volume: 128, Pages: 74 - 82
Published: Dec 1, 2020
Abstract
Objective To assess the relative importance of A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) items. Study Design and Setting A best-worst scaling object case was conducted among a sample of experts in the field of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs). Respondents were asked in a series of 15 choice tasks to choose the most and the least important item from a set of four items from the master list, which included the 16...
Paper Details
Title
Best-worst scaling identified adequate statistical methods and literature search as the most important items of AMSTAR2 (A measurement tool to assess systematic reviews)
Published Date
Dec 1, 2020
Volume
128
Pages
74 - 82
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.