Systematic review with meta-analysis: global prevalence of uninvestigated dyspepsia according to the Rome criteria.

Volume: 52, Issue: 5, Pages: 762 - 773
Published: Sep 1, 2020
Abstract
Background Prevalence of uninvestigated dyspepsia varies across cross‐sectional surveys. This may be due to differences in definitions used or study methodology, rather than global variability. Aim To determine the global prevalence of uninvestigated dyspepsia according to Rome criteria. Methods MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify population‐based studies reporting prevalence of uninvestigated dyspepsia in adults (≥18 years old)...
Paper Details
Title
Systematic review with meta-analysis: global prevalence of uninvestigated dyspepsia according to the Rome criteria.
Published Date
Sep 1, 2020
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
762 - 773
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.