Comparing Needles and Methods of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy to Optimize Specimen Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy for Patients With Pancreatic Masses in a Randomized Trial.

Published on Apr 1, 2021in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology8.549
· DOI :10.1016/J.CGH.2020.06.042
Ji Young Bang28
Estimated H-index: 28
,
Konrad Krall2
Estimated H-index: 2
+ 6 AuthorsShyam Varadarajulu70
Estimated H-index: 70
Sources
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background & Aims Given the lack of procedure standardization, findings vary from analyses of pancreatic tissues collected by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy. It is not clear which needle and technique yield best specimen for analysis. We compared the specimen quality and accuracy of diagnoses made from samples collected by fine-needle biopsy needles using different collection techniques. Methods Patients found to have pancreatic masses during imaging (n=129) were randomly assigned to groups from whom pancreatic tissue samples were collected by reverse-bevel, Menghini-tip, franseen, or fork-tip needles. A second randomization determined the technical sequence of biopsies in each patient (suction, no suction, and stylet retraction). Two independent pathologists, blinded to the type of needle and sampling technique, analyzed all the samples. Final diagnoses of malignancy were made based on surgical resection, death from cancer progression, or findings from radiology or clinical follow-up evaluations (reference standard). The primary objective was to compare cellularity of samples collected, defined as proportion of core tissue in the biopsy sample. Secondary objectives were to compare accuracy of diagnoses made from biopsy samples and identify factors associated with high cellularity. Results One-hundred and nine patients had a final diagnosis of malignancy (84.5%) and 20 patients had benign disease (15.5%). Samples collected by fork-tip or franseen needles had significantly higher cellularity than samples collected by reverse-bevels or Menghini-tip needles (P 3 cm (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.21–3.05; P=.005) were associated with high cellularity of sample. Conclusions In patients with suspected pancreatic cancer, samples with the highest degree of cellularity in a single biopsy, resulting in diagnostic accuracy of 90% of more, were collected by fine-needle biopsy using the franseen or fork-tip needle. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT04085055.
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
82 Citations
8 Citations
1 Citations
References29
Newest
#1Joseph F. LaComb (SBU: Stony Brook University)H-Index: 8
#2Dennis Plenker (CSHL: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)H-Index: 6
Last. Jonathan M. Buscaglia (SBU: Stony Brook University)H-Index: 19
view all 13 authors...
: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has one of the poorest prognoses of all malignancies, with a 5-year survival rate <8%.1,2 Suspicious lesions are typically diagnosed via endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB).3 Fewer needle passes decreases the risk of postprocedure complications, including pancreatitis and hemorrhage, while allowing additional needle passes to be used for adjuvant tissue testing, such as organoid...
4 CitationsSource
2 CitationsSource
#1Antonio Facciorusso (University of Foggia)H-Index: 19
#2Sachin Wani (Anschutz Medical Campus)H-Index: 68
Last. Siddharth Singh (UCSD: University of California, San Diego)H-Index: 67
view all 7 authors...
Abstract Background and Aims Variable diagnostic performance of sampling techniques during EUS-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic masses based on needle type [fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB)] and gauge (19-gauge vs 22-gauge vs 25-gauge) has been reported. We performed a systematic review with network meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided techniques for sampling solid pancreatic masses. Methods Through a systematic literature review...
50 CitationsSource
#1Ka Young Lee (SCH: Soonchunhyang University)H-Index: 1
#2Hyun Deuk Cho (SCH: Soonchunhyang University)H-Index: 12
Last. Tae Hoon Lee (SCH: Soonchunhyang University)H-Index: 28
view all 12 authors...
Background and Aims EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) has a high diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic tumors. Most reports have focused on the diagnostic yield of cytology or histology; the ability of various FNA/B techniques to obtain an adequate mass of cells or tissue has rarely been investigated. Methods Patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy underwent EUS-FNB using a 22-gauge ProCore needle by either the stylet slow-pull-back technique (group A), conventional negativ...
15 CitationsSource
#1Ji Young Bang (Florida Hospital Orlando)H-Index: 28
#2Sachin Kirtane (Florida Hospital Orlando)H-Index: 2
Last. Shyam Varadarajulu (Florida Hospital Orlando)H-Index: 70
view all 7 authors...
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology has been the preferred technique for procuring tissue at endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedures for the past 25 years. To overcome some of the limitations of FNA cytology, fine-needle biopsy (FNB) has been recently developed to yield histological tissue. Main objective was to compare the diagnostic yield of FNB compared to FNA for both onsite and offsite specimen assessment. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at a single tertiar...
40 CitationsSource
#1Ji Young Bang (Florida Hospital Orlando)H-Index: 28
Last. Shyam VaradarajuluH-Index: 70
view all 6 authors...
As cytological aspirates from endoscopic-ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has limited diagnostic sensitivity and are suboptimal for molecular profiling and morphological characterisation of certain neoplasms, a fine needle biopsy (FNB) with three-pronged (Franseen geometry) cutting edge has been developed to procure histology. In a randomised trial of 46 patients with pancreatic masses, procurement of histological core tissue as evidenced by total tissue and tumour areas was si...
50 CitationsSource
#1Ji Young Bang (Florida Hospital Orlando)H-Index: 28
#2Udayakumar Navaneethan (Florida Hospital Orlando)H-Index: 47
Last. Shyam Varadarajulu (Florida Hospital Orlando)H-Index: 70
view all 5 authors...
Background & Aims Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) evaluation vary with technique, needles, and methods of specimen evaluation. We performed a direct comparison of diagnostic yields of EUS-FNA samples collected using different gauge needles (22- vs 25-gauge), with or without suction. Methods We performed a randomized controlled study of 352 patients with suspected pancreatic masses, referred for EUS-FNA at a tertiary referral center. Patients were randoml...
16 CitationsSource
#1Ji Young Bang (Florida Hospital Orlando)H-Index: 28
#2Shantel Hebert-Magee (Florida Hospital Orlando)H-Index: 13
Last. Shyam Varadarajulu (Florida Hospital Orlando)H-Index: 70
view all 6 authors...
Background and Aims Recently, a 3-plane symmetric needle with Franseen geometry and a Fork-tip biopsy needle have been developed for histologic tissue procurement. We compared 22-gauge Franseen and 22-gauge Fork-tip needles in patients undergoing EUS-guided sampling of pancreatic masses. Methods Fifty patients underwent sampling using both 22-gauge Franseen and 22-gauge Fork-tip needles, with randomization of needle order. Two dedicated passes were performed using both needles for cell block. Su...
82 CitationsSource
#1Mehdi Mohamadnejad (UT: University of Tehran)H-Index: 27
#2Daniel Mullady (WashU: Washington University in St. Louis)H-Index: 28
Last. Sachin Wani (Anschutz Medical Campus)H-Index: 68
view all 26 authors...
Background & Aims It is not clear exactly how many passes are required to determine whether pancreatic masses are malignant using endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). We aimed to define the per-pass diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA for establishing the malignancy of a pancreatic mass, and identify factors associated with detection of malignancies. Methods In a prospective study, 239 patients with solid pancreatic masses were randomly assigned to groups that underwent EUS-FNA...
31 CitationsSource
#1Manol Jovani (Harvard University)H-Index: 15
#2Wasif M. Abidi (Brigham and Women's Hospital)H-Index: 9
Last. Linda S. Lee (Brigham and Women's Hospital)H-Index: 21
view all 3 authors...
AbstractBackground: There are very few available data on the novel SharkCore™ needles for EUS-FNB.Aim: Comparison of the performance of the SharkCore™ needles with the standard EUS-FNA needles for the diagnosis of solid upper GI masses.Patients and methods: Single-center, retrospective cohort study in an academic tertiary referral hospital. Patients were matched 1:1 for the site of the lesion and the presence or absence of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE).Results: A total of 102 patients were inc...
31 CitationsSource
Cited By6
Newest
Source
#1Takeshi Tomoda (Okayama University)H-Index: 12
#2Hironari Kato (Okayama University)H-Index: 20
Last. Toshiharu Mitsuhashi (Okayama University)H-Index: 11
view all 11 authors...
BACKGROUND The effects of the Franseen needle size in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) of solid pancreatic masses remain unclear. This study aimed to compare 25G and 22G Franseen needles in terms of adequate tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic masses. METHODS In this single-center, crossover, randomized noninferiority trial, eligible patients underwent EUS-FNB with both 25G and 22G Franseen needles in a randomized order between November 2018 and August 2020. Tissue ...
Source
#1Shunsuke Watanabe (Kyorin University)H-Index: 2
#2Jun Miyoshi (Kyorin University)H-Index: 2
Last. Tadakazu Hisamatsu (Kyorin University)H-Index: 45
view all 15 authors...
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) is a standard method for pathological diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions. The EchoTip ProCore 20G® (PC20), a 20-gauge biopsy needle with a forward-bevel core trap, has been available in Japan since 2015. METHODS We compared the efficacy of the PC20 with that of the EchoTip ProCore 22G® (PC22) and Acquire 22G® (AC22) in EUS-FNA/B for diagnosing pancreatic cancer. This retrospective study included 191 patients wit...
Source
#1J. Iglesias-GarciaH-Index: 3
#2Jose Lariño-NoiaH-Index: 18
Source
#1Livia ArchibugiH-Index: 13
#2Veronica Ruta (UCSC: Catholic University of the Sacred Heart)H-Index: 4
Last. Gabriele CapursoH-Index: 56
view all 13 authors...
Transcriptome analyses allow the distinguishing of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) subtypes, exhibiting different prognoses and chemotherapy responses. However, RNA extraction from pancreatic tissue is cumbersome and has been performed mainly from surgical samples, which are representative of < 20% of cases. The majority of PDAC patients undergo endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA), but RNA has been rarely extracted from EUS-TA with scanty results. Herein, we ai...
2 CitationsSource
#1Kofi Oppong (Newcastle University)H-Index: 22
#2Pardeep Maheshwari (Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust)H-Index: 1
Last. Beate Haugk (Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust)H-Index: 10
view all 7 authors...
Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) performs poorly in the histological diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). The aim of this study was to assess the performance of fine-needle biopsy (FNB) comparing reverse bevel (RB) and fork-tip (FT) needles. Patients and methods A retrospective study of prospectively maintained databases was performed. Patients with a final diagnosis of type 1 AIP who underwent EUS-FNB during diagnostic worku...
1 CitationsSource