Methodologic Considerations on Four Cardiovascular Interventions Trials With Contradictory Results
Abstract
BackgroundContradictory findings from randomized trials addressing similar research questions are not uncommon in medicine. Although differing results may reflect true differences in the treatment effects or in the deliverability of the intervention, more commonly it is as a consequence of small but important discrepancies in study design.MethodsThe writing group selected 4 recent trials with apparently contradictory results (2 on...
Paper Details
Title
Methodologic Considerations on Four Cardiovascular Interventions Trials With Contradictory Results
Published Date
Feb 1, 2021
Volume
111
Issue
2
Pages
690 - 699
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History