Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis and grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective analysis of 110 cases.

Published on Jun 4, 2020in Endoscopy7.341
· DOI :10.1055/A-1180-8614
Salvatore Paiella23
Estimated H-index: 23
,
Luca Landoni19
Estimated H-index: 19
+ 16 AuthorsRoberto Salvia52
Estimated H-index: 52
Sources
Abstract
Background Data on the reliability of the Ki-67 index and grading calculations from endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are controversial. We aimed to assess the accuracy of these data compared with histology. Methods Cytological analysis from EUS-FNA in patients with suspected PanNETs (n = 110) were compared with resection samples at a single institution. A minimum of 2000 cells were considered to be adequate for grading. Correlation and agreement between cytology and histology in grading and Ki-67 values, respectively, were investigated. Secondary outcomes included the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA. Results EUS-FNA samples were adequate for PanNET diagnosis and PanNET grading in 98/110 (89.1 %) and 77/110 (70.0 %) patients, respectively; thus, 77 samples were adequate for comparing cytology vs. histology. There were 67 (62.0 %), 40 (36.4 %), and 1 (0.9 %) patients with a final diagnosis of G1, G2, and G3 tumors, respectively. EUS-FNA grading was concordant with surgical pathology in 81.8 % of patients; under- and overgrading occurred in 15.6 % and 2.6 %, respectively. The overall level of agreement for grading was moderate (Cohen’s κ = 0.59, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.34 – 0.78). Spearman’s rho for Ki-67 in tumors ≤ 20 mm and > 20 mm was strong and moderate, respectively (rho = 0.68, 95 %CI 0.47 – 0.83; rho = 0.59, 95 %CI 0.35 – 0.75). The Bland – Altman plot showed that the Ki-67 values were comparable and reproducible between the two measurements. Conclusions Although they were not available for a significant number of patients, grading and Ki-67 values from cytology correlated with histology moderately to strongly.
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
73 Citations
20137.34Endoscopy
108 Citations
10 Citations
References32
Newest
#1YongYan Cui (Columbia University)H-Index: 1
#2Lauren G. Khanna (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 9
Last. John M. Poneros (Columbia University)H-Index: 25
view all 12 authors...
Background/Aims: The management of small, incidentally discovered nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) has been a matter of debate. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a tool used to identify and risk-stratify PNETs. This study investigates the concordance rate of Ki67 grading between EUS-FNA and surgical pathology specimens in NFPNETs and whether certain NF-PNET characteristics are associated with disease recurrence and disease-related death. Met...
8 CitationsSource
#1John S. LeedsH-Index: 13
#1John S. LeedsH-Index: 21
Last. Kofi OppongH-Index: 22
view all 8 authors...
Background and study aims Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) outcomes are dependent upon grading by Ki67. This study compared endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) to fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in assessing PanNETs. Patients and methods All pancreatic histology for PanNET between January 2009 and June 2017 was included if EUS sampling was performed prior to surgical resection. Ki67 and grade from FNA and FNB samples was compared to surgical histology using correlati...
7 CitationsSource
#1Priscilla A. van Riet (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 5
#2Alberto Larghi (CUA: The Catholic University of America)H-Index: 30
Last. Marco J. Bruno (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 67
view all 39 authors...
Background and Aims Several studies have compared EUS-guided FNA with fine-needle biopsy (FNB), but none have proven superiority. We performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare the performance of a commonly used 25-gauge FNA needle with a newly designed 20-gauge FNB needle. Methods Consecutive patients with a solid lesion were randomized in this international multicenter study between a 25-gauge FNA (EchoTip Ultra) or a 20-gauge FNB needle (ProCore). The primary endpoint was d...
43 CitationsSource
#1Milena Di LeoH-Index: 17
#2L. PolianiH-Index: 3
Last. Silvia CarraraH-Index: 12
view all 16 authors...
BACKGROUND: One of the controversial issues in the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) is the accurate prediction of their clinical behaviour. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) biopsy in the diagnosis and grading of pNETs in a certified ENETS Center. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of EUS biopsy procedures was retrospectively reviewed to identify all consecutive patients referred to a certified ENETS Center wi...
10 CitationsSource
#1Anushka Baruah (MCW: Medical College of Wisconsin)H-Index: 5
#2Volkan Adsay (MCW: Medical College of Wisconsin)H-Index: 3
Last. Murad Aburajab (MCW: Medical College of Wisconsin)H-Index: 6
view all 7 authors...
1 CitationsSource
#1Vivian L. Weiss (VUMC: Vanderbilt University Medical Center)H-Index: 8
#2Colleen M. Kiernan (VUMC: Vanderbilt University Medical Center)H-Index: 14
Last. Chanjuan Shi (VUMC: Vanderbilt University Medical Center)H-Index: 40
view all 6 authors...
Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) has provided grading guidelines for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) based on mitotic count and Ki-67 proliferation index. Driven by the desire to provide earlier tumor grading for clinical management decisions, some groups have proposed grading PanNENs at the time of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) using Ki-67 proliferation rates. Although a Ki-67 rate can be performed on FNA cell blocks, there are potential sampling limitations with th...
10 CitationsSource
#1Hong LiH-Index: 1
#2Wei LiH-Index: 1
Last. Bin FanH-Index: 1
view all 4 authors...
AbstractBackground:The comparison between endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and EUS guided fine needle biopsy (FNB) in sampling pancreatic masses is still controversial.Methods:A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science to identify all relevant rando
14 CitationsSource
#1Luca Landoni (University of Verona)H-Index: 19
#2Giovanni Marchegiani (University of Verona)H-Index: 29
Last. Claudio BassiH-Index: 110
view all 26 authors...
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present analysis is 2-fold: first, to define the evolution of time trends on the surgical approach to pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (Pan-NENs); second, to perform a complete analysis of the predictors of oncologic outcome. BACKGROUND: Reflecting their rarity and heterogeneity, Pan-NENs represent a clinical dilemma. In particular, there is a scarcity of data regarding their long-term follow-up after surgical resection. METHODS: From the Institutional Pan-NEN ...
23 CitationsSource
#1Marcin PolkowskiH-Index: 19
#2Christian JenssenH-Index: 25
Last. Jean-Marc DumonceauH-Index: 75
view all 20 authors...
For routine EUS-guided sampling of solid masses and lymph nodes (LNs) ESGE recommends 25G or 22G needles (high quality evidence, strong recommendation); fine needle aspiration (FNA) and fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles are equally recommended (high quality evidence, strong recommendation). When the primary aim of sampling is to obtain a core tissue specimen, ESGE suggests using 19G FNA or FNB needles or 22G FNB needles (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). ESGE recommends using 10-mL syri...
116 CitationsSource
#1Bin Cheng (HUST: Huazhong University of Science and Technology)H-Index: 1
#2Yueming Zhang (Peking Union Medical College)H-Index: 8
Last. Guiqi Wang (Peking Union Medical College)H-Index: 17
view all 13 authors...
Background & Aims Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needles with side fenestrations are used to collect aspirates for cytology analysis and biopsy samples for histologic analysis. We conducted a large, multicenter study to compare the accuracy of diagnosis via specimens collected with fine-needle biopsy (FNB) versus fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for patients with pancreatic and nonpancreatic masses. Methods We performed a prospective single-blind study at 5 tertiary care centers in China. T...
55 CitationsSource
Cited By2
Newest
Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) are relatively rare, but their incidence has increased significantly in the last decades. Precise diagnosis and prognostic stratification are crucial for proper patient management. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the modality of choice for diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumors, showing a higher tumor detection rate than other imaging modalities, especially for small size lesions. EUS also serves as a guide for preoperative sampling and other interventi...
Source
#1Aditya S. Shirali (University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
#2Carolina R.C. Pieterman (University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)H-Index: 2
Last. Nancy D. Perrier (University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)H-Index: 58
view all 11 authors...
Source
#2Serena AmmendolaH-Index: 3
Last. Erminia ManfrinH-Index: 24
view all 16 authors...
Abstract Background/objectives Studies comparing EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are lacking. We aimed at comparing EUS-FNA with EUS-FNB in terms of Ki-67 proliferative index (PI) estimation capability, cellularity of the samples, and reliability of Ki-67 PI/tumor grading compared with surgical specimens. Methods Patients diagnosed with pNETs on EUS and/or surgical specimens we...
1 CitationsSource
#1Tatsuya IshiiH-Index: 2
#2Akio KatanumaH-Index: 2
Last. Kuniyuki TakahashiH-Index: 21
view all 8 authors...
Although pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) are relatively rare tumors, their number is increasing with advances in diagnostic imaging modalities. Even small lesions that are difficult to detect using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging can now be detected with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Contrast-enhanced EUS is useful, and not only diagnosis but also malignancy detection has become possible by evaluating the vascularity of tumors. Pathological diagnosis using EUS with f...
Source