Cone versus conventional repair for Ebstein's anomaly

Volume: 160, Issue: 6, Pages: 1545 - 1553
Published: Dec 1, 2020
Abstract

Abstract

Objectives

We aimed to investigate tricuspid valve function and adverse events after conventional repair and valve replacement for Ebstein's anomaly and compare them with cone repair.

Methods

The medical records of 151 patients (mean age, 25 years; 62% were female) who underwent operation in a single center from 1985 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. To determine tricuspid valve regurgitation during...
Paper Details
Title
Cone versus conventional repair for Ebstein's anomaly
Published Date
Dec 1, 2020
Volume
160
Issue
6
Pages
1545 - 1553
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.