Reconsidering statistical methods for assessing replication.

Volume: 26, Issue: 1, Pages: 127 - 139
Published: Feb 1, 2021
Abstract
Recent empirical evaluations of replication in psychology have reported startlingly few successful replication attempts. At the same time, these programs have noted that the proper way to analyze replication studies is far from a settled matter and have analyzed their data in several different ways. This presents 2 challenges to interpreting the results of these programs. First, different analysis methods assess different operational definitions...
Paper Details
Title
Reconsidering statistical methods for assessing replication.
Published Date
Feb 1, 2021
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
127 - 139
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.