Treatment and control groups

Statistics

Creativity

Epistemology

Developmental psychology

Philosophy

Mathematics education

Paleontology

Artificial intelligence

Psychology

Creative problem-solving

Chemistry

Pedagogy

Sample (material)

Control (management)

Test (biology)

Quality (philosophy)

Creative thinking

Mathematics

Computer science

Chromatography

Curriculum

Aptitude

Social psychology

Biology

European Journal of Educational Research

&lt;p style="text-align:justify"&gt;The development of the revolution era 4.0 which increasingly rapidly demands the wider community to have the ability to think creatively mathematically. One effort to improve the ability to think creatively is through quality education. Quality education can be improved through to train thinking using the right learning model. This study aims to see which results are more effective in improving students' thinking skills between the two learning models applied. The two models are Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) models. This research method uses quasi experimental method with a posttest only control test design not control group. This study uses two group subjects with two experimental classes. The analysis of the data used the hypothesis testing of the non-correlated 2-sample t-test. Based on the research results obtained Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) models have a better effect on students' creative thinking abilities compared to Problem Based Learning (PBL) models.&lt;/p&gt;

The Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning and Aptitude Treatment Interaction in Improving Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills on Curriculum 2013