Ignoring competing events in the analysis of survival data may lead to biased results: a nonmathematical illustration of competing risk analysis

Volume: 122, Pages: 42 - 48
Published: Jun 1, 2020
Abstract
ObjectiveCompeting events are often ignored in epidemiological studies. Conventional methods for the analysis of survival data assume independent or noninformative censoring, which is violated when subjects that experience a competing event are censored. Because many survival studies do not apply competing risk analysis, we explain and illustrate in a nonmathematical way how to analyze and interpret survival data in the presence of competing...
Paper Details
Title
Ignoring competing events in the analysis of survival data may lead to biased results: a nonmathematical illustration of competing risk analysis
Published Date
Jun 1, 2020
Volume
122
Pages
42 - 48
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.