Study structure may compromise understanding of longitudinal decision regret stability: A systematic review
Abstract
To perform a systematic review of decision regret studies in cancer patients to determine if regret is longitudinally stable, and whether these study structures account for late-emerging treatment effects. Online databases including the George Mason Libraries, Global Health, Nursing and Allied Health, and PubMed were searched to identify decision regret studies with longitudinal components in patients with cancer. A total of 845 unique citations...
Paper Details
Title
Study structure may compromise understanding of longitudinal decision regret stability: A systematic review
Published Date
Aug 1, 2020
Volume
103
Issue
8
Pages
1507 - 1517
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History