Pancreaticojejunostomy With Externalized Stent vs Pancreaticogastrostomy With Externalized Stent for Patients With High-Risk Pancreatic Anastomosis: A Single-Center, Phase 3, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Published on Apr 1, 2020in JAMA Surgery13.625
· DOI :10.1001/JAMASURG.2019.6035
Stefano Andrianello16
Estimated H-index: 16
(University of Verona),
Giovanni Marchegiani29
Estimated H-index: 29
(University of Verona)
+ 9 AuthorsClaudio Bassi110
Estimated H-index: 110
(University of Verona)
Importance The operative scenarios with the highest postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) risk represent situations in which fistula prevention and mitigation strategies have the strongest potential to affect surgical outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Evidence from studies providing risk stratification is lacking. Objective To investigate whether pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) or pancreaticogastrostomy (PG), both with externalized transanastomotic stent, is the best reconstruction method for patients at high risk of POPF after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants A single-center, phase 3, randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy, from July 12, 2017, through March 15, 2019, among adults undergoing elective pancreaticoduodenectomy and considered at high risk for pancreatic fistula after intraoperative assessment of the fistula risk score, some of whom were randomized to undergo PG or PJ. All analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Interventions Intervention consisted of PJ or PG, both with externalized transanastomotic stent and octreotide omission. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was POPF. The secondary end points were Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher morbidity, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, and average complication burden. Results A total of 604 patients were screened for eligibility; 82 were at high risk for POPF (fistula risk score, 7-10), and 72 were randomized undergo PG (n = 36; 20 men and 16 women; median age, 65 years [interquartile range, 23-82]) or PJ (n = 36; 26 men and 10 women; median age, 63 years [interquartile range, 35-79]). There was no significant difference in the incidence of POPF between patients who underwent PG and patients who underwent PJ (18 [50.0%] vs 14 [38.9%];P = .48), but for patients who developed a POPF, the mean (SD) average complication burden was lower for those who underwent PJ than for those who underwent PG (0.25 [0.13] vs 0.39 [0.17];P = .04). The rates of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (14 [38.9%] in the PG group vs 9 [25.0%] in the PJ group;P = .31) and delayed gastric emptying (16 [44.4%] in the PG group vs 18 [50.0%] in the PJ group;P = .81) were similar, but patients who underwent PG presented with a significantly higher incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher morbidity than those who underwent PJ (17 [47.2%] vs 8 [22.2%];P = .047). Conclusions and Relevance Among patients at the highest risk for POPF, those who underwent PG or PJ experienced similar rates of POPF. However, PG was associated with an increased incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher morbidity and with an increased average complication burden for the patients who developed a POPF. For patients at high risk for pancreatic fistula, PJ with the use of externalized stent and octreotide omission should be considered the most appropriate technical strategy. Trial Registration Identifier:NCT03212196
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
4 Citations
89 Citations
#1Elisa Bannone (University of Verona)H-Index: 3
#2Stefano AndrianelloH-Index: 16
Last. Roberto SalviaH-Index: 52
view all 7 authors...
Objective:The aim of the study is to characterize postoperative acute pancreatitis (POAP).Summary Background Data:A standardized definition of POAP after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has been recently proposed, but specific studies are lacking.Methods:The patients were extracted from the prospective
45 CitationsSource
The goal of our study was to compare the impact of pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) versus pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) on the incidence of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. A systematic search was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. A meta-analysis showed that PG was not superior to PJ in ter
23 CitationsSource
#1Brett L. Ecker (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 18
#2Matthew T. McMillan (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 23
Last. Charles M. Vollmer (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 67
view all 38 authors...
Objective:The aim of this study was to identify the optimal fistula mitigation strategy following pancreaticoduodenectomy.Background:The utility of technical strategies to prevent clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) may vary by the circ
65 CitationsSource
#1Giovanni Marchegiani (University of Verona)H-Index: 29
#2Stefano Andrianello (University of Verona)H-Index: 16
Last. Roberto Salvia (University of Verona)H-Index: 52
view all 10 authors...
Background Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is used for borderline-resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (PDAC) and exhibits promising results in terms of pathological outcomes. However, little is known about its effect on surgical complications.
42 CitationsSource
#1Claudio BassiH-Index: 110
Last. M.W. Büchler (Heidelberg University)H-Index: 79
view all 33 authors...
Background In 2005, the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula developed a definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula that has been accepted universally. Eleven years later, because postoperative pancreatic fistula remains one of the most relevant and harmful complications of pancreatic operation, the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula classification has become the gold standard in defining postoperative pancreatic fistula in clinical practice. The aim of th...
1,355 CitationsSource
#1Marc G. Besselink (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 84
#2L. Bengt van Rijssen (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 9
Last. Dirk J. Gouma (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 101
view all 27 authors...
Background Recent literature suggests that chyle leak may complicate up to 10% of pancreatic resections. Treatment depends on its severity, which may include chylous ascites. No international consensus definition or grading system of chyle leak currently is available. Methods The International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery, an international panel of pancreatic surgeons working in well-known, high-volume centers, reviewed the literature and worked together to establish a consensus on the defi...
95 CitationsSource
#1Matthew T. McMillan (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 23
#2Brett L. Ecker (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 18
Last. Charles M. Vollmer (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 67
view all 12 authors...
Background Evidence suggests externalized trans-anastomotic stents may be beneficial as a fistula mitigation strategy for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD); however, previous studies have not been rigorously risk-adjusted.
23 CitationsSource
#1Saxon Connor (Christchurch Hospital)H-Index: 34
Introduction Post-operative pancreatic fistula has been well defined. However the underlying aetiology remains poorly understood. The aim of this review was to investigate whether the underlying aetiology for a proportion of patients suffering from post-operative pancreatic fistula was due to post-operative pancreatitis.
50 CitationsSource
#1Tobias KeckH-Index: 41
#2Ulrich F. WellnerH-Index: 30
Last. U. T. HoptH-Index: 7
view all 36 authors...
Objectives:To assess pancreatic fistula rate and secondary endpoints after pancreatogastrostomy (PG) versus pancreatojejunostomy (PJ) for reconstruction in pancreatoduodenectomy in the setting of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Background:PJ and PG are established methods for reconstruction in pancreatoduodenectomy. Recent prospective trials suggest superiority of the PG regarding perioperative complications.Methods:A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial comparing PG wit...
190 CitationsSource
#1Shin-E Wang (Taipei Veterans General Hospital)H-Index: 17
#2Shih-Chin Chen (Taipei Veterans General Hospital)H-Index: 8
Last. Yi-Ming Shyr (Taipei Veterans General Hospital)H-Index: 27
view all 4 authors...
Background The aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes after Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) and pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) for pancreatic-enteric reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy.
40 CitationsSource
Cited By25
#2Anan LiuH-Index: 8
Last. Guang YangH-Index: 2
view all 13 authors...
#1Chris Varghese (University of Auckland)H-Index: 4
#2Cameron I. Wells (University of Auckland)H-Index: 10
Last. Sanjay Pandanaboyana (Newcastle University)H-Index: 15
view all 6 authors...
Abstract null null Background null The incidence of and risk factors for chyle leak, as defined by the 2017 International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery, remain unknown. null null null Methods null MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus were systematically searched for studies of patients undergoing pancreatectomy that reported chyle leak according to the 2017 International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery definition. The primary outcomes were the incidence of overall and clinically relevant chyle leak...
#1Mariam Adamu (TUD: Dresden University of Technology)H-Index: 2
#2Verena Plodeck (TUD: Dresden University of Technology)H-Index: 8
Last. Marius Distler (TUD: Dresden University of Technology)H-Index: 20
view all 7 authors...
PURPOSE Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major complication of pancreatic surgery and can be fatal. Better stratification of patients into risk groups may help to select those who might benefit from strategies to prevent complications. The aim of this study was to validate ten prognostic scores in patients who underwent pancreatic head surgery. METHODS A total of 364 patients were included in this study between September 2012 and August 2017. Ten risk scores were applied to this coho...
#1Ekaterina PetrovaH-Index: 5
#2J. Annelie Suurmeijer (UvA: University of Amsterdam)
Last. Tobias KeckH-Index: 41
view all 12 authors...
Abstract null null Background null Evidence on the optimal pancreatic anastomosis during pancreatoduodenectomy is inconclusive. Large multicenter and nationwide registries may provide additional insights. The study compared the practice and outcome of different pancreatic anastomoses during pancreatoduodenectomy, focusing on the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula, in two large audits of pancreatic surgery. null null null Methods null Posthoc analysis of patients after pancreatoduodenectomy...
#1Roberto Salvia (University of Verona)H-Index: 52
#2Gabriella Lionetto (University of Verona)H-Index: 1
Last. Giovanni Marchegiani (University of Verona)H-Index: 29
view all 5 authors...
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) still represents the major driver of surgical morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The purpose of this narrative review was to critically analyze current evidence supporting the use of total pancreatectomy (TP) to prevent the development of POPF in patients with high-risk pancreas, and to explore the role of completion total pancreatectomy (CP) in the management of severe POPF. Considering the encouraging perioperative outcomes, TP may represent a prom...
1 CitationsSource
#1Giampaolo PerriH-Index: 9
Last. Claudio BassiH-Index: 110
view all 11 authors...
Abstract null null Background null Existing postoperative pancreatic fistula risk scores rely on intraoperative parameters, which limits their value in the preoperative setting. A preoperative predictive model to stratify the risk of developing postoperative pancreatic fistula before pancreatoduodenectomy was built and externally validated. null null null Methods null A regression risk-tree model for preoperative postoperative pancreatic fistula risk stratification was developed in the Verona Un...
1 CitationsSource
#1Stefano Andrianello (University of Verona)H-Index: 16
#2Giovanni Marchegiani (University of Verona)H-Index: 29
Last. Roberto Salvia (University of Verona)H-Index: 52
view all 9 authors...
Abstract Background Several advantages and pitfalls have been related to externalized trans-anastomotic stents (ETS) after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of an ETS effect in a risk-stratified setting. Methods Data from patients at either intermediate- or high-risk for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following pancreaticoduodenectomy were prospectively analyzed from January 2016 to December 2019. Outcomes included POPF rate, mean complicat...
3 CitationsSource
#1Giovanni Marchegiani (University of Verona)H-Index: 29
#2Claudio Bassi (University of Verona)H-Index: 110
2 CitationsSource
#2Hiroshi NodaH-Index: 16
Last. Toshiki RikiyamaH-Index: 15
view all 10 authors...
Abstract Background We investigated the risk factors for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with a nondilated main pancreatic duct. Methods We investigated a total of 354 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. The diameter of the main pancreatic duct, the shortest distance from the body surface to the pancreas (the pancreatic depth), and the computed tomography attenuation index (the difference between the pancreatic and spleni...
1 CitationsSource
#1Roberto Salvia (University of Verona)H-Index: 52
#2Giovanni Marchegiani (University of Verona)H-Index: 29
Last. Claudio Bassi (University of Verona)H-Index: 110
view all 12 authors...
BACKGROUND The application of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) risk stratification and mitigation strategies requires an update of the protocol for an early drain removal after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of the study is to highlight the unreliability of a single drain fluid amylase (DFA) cutoff-based protocol in the setting of a risk-based drain management. METHODS The role of postoperative day one (POD1) DFA in predicting POPF was explored in the setting of both selective drai...
3 CitationsSource