Causes of Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancers Based on World Endoscopy Organization System of Analysis.

Published on Apr 1, 2020in Gastroenterology17.373
· DOI :10.1053/J.GASTRO.2019.12.031
Rebecca Anderson2
Estimated H-index: 2
(Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust),
Nicholas E Burr14
Estimated H-index: 14
(University of Leeds),
Roland Valori32
Estimated H-index: 32
(Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust)
Abstract Background & Aims Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) is CRC diagnosed after a colonoscopy in which no cancer was found. A consensus article from the World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) proposed an approach for investigating and categorizing PCCRCs detected within 4 years of a colonoscopy. We aimed to identify cases of PCCRC and the factors that cause them, test the WEO system of categorization, quantify the proportion of avoidable PCCRCs, and propose a target rate for PCCRCs detected within 3 years of a colonoscopy that did not detect CRC. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 107 PCCRCs identified at a single medical center in England from Jan 1, 2010 through December 31, 2017 using coding and endoscopy data. For each case, we reviewed clinical, pathology, radiology, and endoscopy findings. Using the WEO recommendations, we performed a root cause analysis of each case, categorizing lesions as: possible missed lesion, prior examination adequate; possible missed lesion, prior examination inadequate; detected lesion, not resected; or likely incomplete resection of previously identified lesion. We determined whether PCCRCs could be attributed to the colonoscopist for technical or decision-making reasons, and whether the PCCRC was avoidable or unavoidable, based on the WEO categorization and size of tumor. The endoscopy reporting system provided performance data for individual endoscopists. Results Of the PCCRCs identified, 43% were in high-risk patients (those with inflammatory bowel disease, previous CRC, previous multiple large polyps or hereditary cancer syndromes) and 66% were located distal to the hepatic flexure. There was no correlation between post-colonoscopy colorectal tumor size and time to diagnosis after index colonoscopy. Bowel preparation was poor in 19% of index colonoscopies, and only 36% of complete colonoscopies had adequate photo documentation of completion. Development of 73% of PCCRCs was determined to be affected by technical endoscopic factors, 17% of PCCRCs by administrative factors (follow-up procedures delayed/not booked by administrative staff), and 27% of PCCRCs by decision-making factors. Twenty-seven percent of PCCRCs were categorized as possible missed lesion, prior examination adequate; 58% as possible missed lesion, prior examination inadequate; 8% as detected lesion, not resected; and 7% as incomplete resection of previously observed lesion; 89% were deemed to be avoidable. Conclusions In a retrospective analysis of PCCRCs, using the WEO system of categorization, we found 43% to occur in high-risk patients; this might be reduced with more vigilant surveillance. Measures are needed to reduce technical, decision-making and administrative factors. We found that 89% of PCCRCs may be avoidable. If half of avoidable PCCRCs could be prevented, the target rate of 2% for the PCCRC-3y benchmark would be achievable.
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
3 Citations
3 Citations
3 Authors (Rawen Kader, ..., Gareth Corbett)
#1Nicholas E Burr (University of Leeds)H-Index: 14
#2Edmund Derbyshire (Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust)H-Index: 1
Last. Eva Morris (University of Leeds)H-Index: 29
view all 9 authors...
Abstract Objectives To quantify post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) rates in England by using recent World Endoscopy Organisation guidelines, compare incidence among colonoscopy providers, and explore associated factors that could benefit from quality improvement initiatives. Design Population based cohort study. Setting National Health Service in England between 2005 and 2013. Population All people undergoing colonoscopy and subsequently diagnosed as having colorectal cancer up to three ...
34 CitationsSource
#1Nam Hee Kim (SKKU: Sungkyunkwan University)H-Index: 12
#2Yoon Suk Jung (SKKU: Sungkyunkwan University)H-Index: 19
Last. Chong Il Sohn (SKKU: Sungkyunkwan University)H-Index: 28
view all 6 authors...
Background and Aims A fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is often repeated annually, even after a recent colonoscopy. However, there are no published data on the proper approach to FIT-positive patients after a recent colonoscopy. We compared colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACRN) prevalence based on the interval since the last colonoscopy. Methods We reviewed asymptomatic screenees aged ≥50 years who underwent FIT and colonoscopy. Results Of 2228 FIT-positive participants...
10 CitationsSource
#1Elisabeth MackenH-Index: 10
#2Stefan Van Dongen (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 27
Last. Guido Van Hal (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 20
view all 6 authors...
Background and study aims Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) is an important quality parameter of colonoscopy. Most studies have shown that the risk for colorectal cancer is reduced after an index colonoscopy for screening or diagnostic purposes with or without polypectomy. In this study, we aimed to quantify and describe PCCRC in Belgium, including the possible relationships with patient, physician, and colonoscopy characteristics. Patients and methods Reimbursement data on colorectal r...
6 CitationsSource
#1Nicholas E Burr (University of Leeds)H-Index: 14
#2Roland ValoriH-Index: 32
1 CitationsSource
#1Theodore A. Tollivoro (KP: Kaiser Permanente)H-Index: 2
#2Christopher D. Jensen (KP: Kaiser Permanente)H-Index: 18
Last. Douglas A. Corley (KP: Kaiser Permanente)H-Index: 73
view all 13 authors...
Background and Aims Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) are defined as those detected ≤10 years after an index colonoscopy negative for cancer, but modifiable risk factors are not well established in large, community-based populations. Methods We evaluated risk factors from the index colonoscopy for PCCRCs diagnosed 1 to 10 years after an index colonoscopy using a case-control design. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were adjusted for potential confounders. Results A pr...
13 CitationsSource
#1Roland Valori (Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust)H-Index: 32
#2Siwan Thomas-Gibson (Imperial College London)H-Index: 30
5 CitationsSource
#1Matthew D. Rutter (Newcastle University)H-Index: 48
#2Iosif Beintaris (University Hospital of North Tees)H-Index: 7
Last. Silvia Sanduleanu (UM: Maastricht University)H-Index: 30
view all 22 authors...
Background & Aims Colonoscopy examination does not always detect colorectal cancer (CRC)— some patients develop CRC after negative findings from an examination. When this occurs before the next recommended examination, it is called interval cancer. From a colonoscopy quality assurance perspective, that term is too restrictive, so the term post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) was created in 2010. However, PCCRC definitions and methods for calculating rates vary among studies, making it impo...
87 CitationsSource
#1Yohei YabuuchiH-Index: 7
#2Kenichiro ImaiH-Index: 26
Last. Hiroyuki OnoH-Index: 30
view all 16 authors...
Abstract Background and Aims There is an increased risk of developing metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) in the remnant colorectum after surgical resection of CRC. We evaluated the incidence of metachronous advanced neoplasia (AN) after surgery for CRC according to resection type and synchronous AN. Methods This cohort study included patients who underwent surgical resection for initial CRC at a tertiary cancer center in Japan between September 2002 and December 2012. The cumulative probabilit...
7 CitationsSource
#1Tanja E Argillander (LUMC: Leiden University Medical Center)H-Index: 5
#2Jan J. Koornstra (UMCG: University Medical Center Groningen)H-Index: 32
Last. Hans F. A. Vasen (LUMC: Leiden University Medical Center)H-Index: 116
view all 10 authors...
Background and objective: Despite intensive colonoscopic surveillance, a substantial proportion of Lynch syndrome (LS) patients develop colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to characterize incident CRC in LS patients. Methods: All patients diagnosed with incident CRC after start of colonoscopic surveillance were identified in the Dutch LS Registry of 905 patients. A retrospective analysis of patient records was carried out for patient characteristics, survival, CRC characteristics ...
11 CitationsSource
#1Sanjay K. Murthy (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute)H-Index: 21
#2Eric I. Benchimol (U of O: University of Ottawa)H-Index: 41
Last. Catherine Dubé (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute)H-Index: 13
view all 7 authors...
Background and Aims Colorectal cancers (CRCs) diagnosed between 6 and 36 months after colonoscopy, termed postcolonoscopy CRCs (PCCRCs), arise primarily due to missed or inadequately treated neoplasms during colonoscopy. Introduction of multiple quality indicators and technological advances to colonoscopy practice should have reduced the PCCRC rate over time. We assessed temporal trends in the population rate of PCCRC as a measure of changing colonoscopy quality. Methods We conducted a populatio...
12 CitationsSource
Cited By22
#1Marco Spadaccini (Humanitas University)H-Index: 14
#2Andrea Iannone (University of Bari)H-Index: 15
Last. Piera Alessia GaltieriH-Index: 9
view all 22 authors...
Summary null null Background null Computer-aided detection (CADe) techniques based on artificial intelligence algorithms can assist endoscopists in detecting colorectal neoplasia. CADe has been associated with an increased adenoma detection rate, a key quality indicator, but the utility of CADe compared with existing advanced imaging techniques and distal attachment devices is unclear. null null null Methods null For this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we did a comprehensive search...
There is wide variation in the recommendations for photodocumentation at colonoscopy. The British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) quality assurance standard suggests ‘photographic proof of ileocaecal valve, terminal ileum, anastomosis or appendix orifice [is] required in all cases’.1 Like the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE)/American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) guidelines,2 documentation of any other part of the colon is not currently mandated. Although caecal photo...
#1Andrew R. Reinink (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 2
#2Aasma Shaukat (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 44
#1Frederikke Schønfeldt Troelsen (Aarhus University Hospital)H-Index: 2
#2Henrik Toft Sørensen (BU: Boston University)H-Index: 146
Last. Rune Erichsen (Aarhus University Hospital)H-Index: 29
view all 5 authors...
ABSTRACT Background and aims Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) account for up to 50% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We investigated characteristics of IBD patients with PCCRC and their survival. Methods We identified IBD patients (ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's Disease [CD]) diagnosed with CRC from 1995 to 2015. We defined PCCRC as diagnosed between 6 and 36 months, and detected CRC (dCRC) as diagnosed within 6 months after colonos...
#1Tiing Leong AngH-Index: 2
view all 2 authors...
#1Yixin Xu (Xuzhou Medical College)H-Index: 2
#1Yixin Xu (Jiangsu University)H-Index: 4
Last. Xuezhong Xu (Jiangsu University)H-Index: 6
view all 6 authors...
BACKGROUND Endoscopy is the optimal choice of diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. Following the advancements made in medical technology, different kinds of novel endoscopy-methods have emerged. Although the significant progress in the penetration of endoscopic tools that have markedly improved the diagnostic rate of GI diseases, there are still some limitations, including instability of human diagnostic performance caused by intensive labor burden and high missed diagnosis rate of subtl...
#1Rolf Hultcrantz (KI: Karolinska Institutet)H-Index: 59
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is besides breast, prostate, lung and skin cancers the most common cancers worldwide, and CRC is suitable for screening. The incidence of CRC varies considerably in different parts of the world; in well-developed countries, the incidence is between 30 and 70 per 100 000 inhabitants. In less developed countries such as Sub-Saharan Africa, the incidence is 10-20/100 000. Women have a lower incidence of CRC, and usually they have a 1/3 lower incidence. Several studies have s...
3 CitationsSource
#1John T. Anderson (Cheltenham General Hospital)H-Index: 10