Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas using a swept-source optical biometer.

Published on Jan 14, 2020in PLOS ONE2.74
· DOI :10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0227638
Se-Young Kim2
Estimated H-index: 2
(Inha University),
Seunghyun Lee4
Estimated H-index: 4
(Inha University)
+ 2 AuthorsJi Won Jung6
Estimated H-index: 6
(Inha University)
Purpose To compare the accuracy of the five commonly used intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas integrated to a swept-source optical biometer, the IOLMaster 700, and evaluate the extent of bias within each formula for different ocular biometric measurements. Methods The study included patients undergoing cataract surgery with a ZCB00 IOL implant, using IOLMaster 700 optical biometry. A single eye per patient was included in the final analysis for a total of 324 cases. The SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis, Holladay 2, and Barrett Universal II formulas were evaluated. The correlations between the refractive prediction errors calculated using the five formulas and ocular dimensions such as axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), corneal power, and lens thickness (LT) were analyzed. Results There were significant differences in the median absolute error predicted by the five formulas after the adjustment for mean refractive prediction errors to zero (P = 0.038). The Barrett Universal II formula had the lowest median absolute error (0.263) and resulted in a higher percentage of eyes with prediction errors within ±0.50 D, ±0.75 D, and ±1.00 D (all P < 0.050). The refractive errors predicted by only the Barrett formula showed no significant correlation with the ocular dimensions: AL, ACD, corneal power, and LT. Conclusions Overall, the Barrett Universal II formula, integrated to a swept-source optical biometer had the lowest prediction error and appeared to have the least bias for different ocular biometric measurements for the ZCB00 IOL.
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
14 Citations
123 Citations
5 Citations
#1Soonwon Yang (Catholic University of Korea)H-Index: 4
#2Woong-Joo Whang (Catholic University of Korea)H-Index: 6
Last. Choun-Ki Joo (Catholic University of Korea)H-Index: 49
view all 3 authors...
Purpose To investigate the effect of anterior chamber depth (ACD) on the refractive outcomes of the SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q and Haigis formulae in short, normal, long and extremely long eyes. Methods This retrospective study involved patients who had uncomplicated cataract surgery. Preoperative axial length (AL) was divided into four subgroups: short (< 22.00 mm), normal (22.00–24.49 mm), long (24.50–25.99 mm), extremely long (≥ 26.00 mm). Preoperative ACD was divided into three subgroups: <...
7 CitationsSource
#1Soyeon JungH-Index: 1
#2Hee Seung ChinH-Index: 15
Last. Ji Won JungH-Index: 6
view all 5 authors...
Purpose. To assess the repeatability and agreement of parameters obtained with two biometers and to compare the predictability. Methods. Biometry was performed on 101 eyes with cataract using the IOLMaster 700 and the Galilei G6. Three measurements were obtained per eye with each device, and repeatability was evaluated. The axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), keratometry (K), white-to-white (WTW) corneal diameter, central corneal thickness (CCT), and lens thickness (LT) were measure...
17 CitationsSource
#1Giacomo SaviniH-Index: 48
#2Kenneth J. Hoffer (UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles)H-Index: 32
Last. Piero Barboni (UniSR: Vita-Salute San Raffaele University)H-Index: 58
view all 6 authors...
Abstract To investigate the accuracy of the measurements provided by a new optical biometer (OA-2000, Tomey Corporation, Nagoya, Japan) for calculating the intraocular lens (IOL) power and to compare the refractive outcomes to those obtained with the IOLMaster 500 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). In this interventional multicenter study, consecutive patients having cataract surgery were enrolled. Only the IOL model used in the largest sample of patients was selected and the eyes implanted wi...
21 CitationsSource
#1Ronald B. MellesH-Index: 20
#2Jack T. Holladay (BCM: Baylor College of Medicine)H-Index: 42
Last. William J. ChangH-Index: 4
view all 3 authors...
Purpose To compare the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas (Barrett Universal II, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Olsen, and SRK/T) in the prediction of postoperative refraction using a single optical biometry device. Design Retrospective consecutive case series. Participants A total of 13 301 cataract operations with an AcrySof SN60WF implant and 5200 operations with a SA60AT implant (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX). Methods All patients undergoing catara...
155 CitationsSource
#1Li WangH-Index: 47
#1Li WangH-Index: 36
Last. Adi AbulafiaH-Index: 8
view all 4 authors...
55 CitationsSource
#1Sabite E. Gökce (BCM: Baylor College of Medicine)H-Index: 2
#2John H Zeiter (BCM: Baylor College of Medicine)H-Index: 4
Last. Li Wang (BCM: Baylor College of Medicine)H-Index: 36
view all 6 authors...
Purpose To investigate the accuracy of 7 intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas in predicting refractive outcome in eyes with axial lengths (AL) equal to or less than 22.0 mm and to evaluate factors contributing to prediction errors. Setting Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, and private practice, Mesa, Arizona, USA. Design Retrospective case series. Methods Eighty-six eyes of 67 patients were included. Seven IOL calculation formulas were evaluated: Barrett Un...
42 CitationsSource
#1Teresa Ferrer-Blasco (University of Valencia)H-Index: 30
#2Alberto Domínguez-Vicent (University of Valencia)H-Index: 12
Last. Robert Montés-Micó (University of Valencia)H-Index: 59
view all 6 authors...
Purpose The purpose was to evaluate the repeatability of a new swept-source optical biometer for measuring ocular biometric parameters.
19 CitationsSource
#1Jack X. Kane (USYD: University of Sydney)H-Index: 4
#1Jack X. Kane (USYD: University of Sydney)H-Index: 4
Last. Constantinos Petsoglou (USYD: University of Sydney)H-Index: 6
view all 4 authors...
Purpose To assess the accuracy of 7 intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas (Barrett Universal II, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, SRK/T, and T2) using IOLMaster biometry and optimized lens constants. Setting Public hospital ophthalmology department. Design Retrospective case series. Methods Data from patients having uneventful cataract surgery with Acrysof IQ SN60WF IOL implantation over 5 years were obtained from the biometry and patient charts. Optimized lens constants were calculated...
123 CitationsSource
#1David L. Cooke (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 6
#1David L. Cooke (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 6
Last. Timothy L. Cooke (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 2
view all 2 authors...
Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of 9 intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas using 2 optical biometers. Setting Private practice, Saint Joseph, Michigan, USA. Design Retrospective consecutive case series. Methods Nine IOL power formula predictions with observed refractions after cataract surgery were compared using 1 IOL platform. The performance of each formula was ranked for accuracy by machine and by axial length (AL). The Olsen was further divided by a preinstalled version (Olsen OLCR )...
98 CitationsSource
#1Kenneth J. Hoffer (UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles)H-Index: 32
#2Peter C. Hoffmann (UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles)H-Index: 1
Last. Giacomo Savini (UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles)H-Index: 48
view all 3 authors...
Purpose To investigate agreement between the IOLMaster 700 based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and the Lenstar LS 900 based on optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR). Setting Private practice, Castrop-Rouxelle, Germany. Design Prospective evaluation of diagnostic test. Methods Axial length (AL), keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (corneal epithelium to lens) (ACD), lens thickness, and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured in 183 eyes of 183 patients. Anal...
41 CitationsSource
Cited By4
#1Jiaqi Meng (Fudan University)H-Index: 2
#2Ling Wei (Fudan University)H-Index: 2
Last. Xiangjia Zhu (Fudan University)H-Index: 12
view all 6 authors...
BACKGROUND To evaluate the distribution of lens thickness (LT) and its associations with other ocular biometric factors among cataract patients in Shanghai. METHODS Twenty-four thousand thirteen eyes from 24,013 cataract patients were retrospectively included. Ocular biometric factors including LT, central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), white-to-white (WTW) distance, anterior corneal curvature, and axial length (AL) were obtained using the IOLMaster700. The associations b...
#1Ayoung ChoiH-Index: 1
#2Hyung-Goo KwonH-Index: 1
Last. Sohee JeonH-Index: 14
view all 3 authors...
The accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations is suboptimal for long or short eyes, which results in a low visual quality after multifocal IOL implantation. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of IOL formulas (Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and Haigis) for the Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, United States) implantation based on the axial length (AXL) from a large cohort of 2018 cases and identify the fac...
1 CitationsSource
#1Ivajlo Popov (Comenius University in Bratislava)H-Index: 1
#2Veronika Popova (Comenius University in Bratislava)
Last. Vladimir Krasnik (Comenius University in Bratislava)H-Index: 5
view all 4 authors...
Background and Objectives: To evaluate the performance of intraocular lenses (IOLs) using power calculation formulas on different types of IOL. Materials and Methods: 120 eyes and four IOL types (BioLine Yellow Accurate Aspheric IOL (i-Medical), TECNIS ZCB00, TECNIS ZA9003 (Johnson & Johnson) (3-piece IOL) and Softec HD (Lenstec)) were analyzed. The performance of Haigis, Barret Universal II and SKR-II formulas were compared between IOL types. The mean prediction error (ME) and mean absolute pre...
#1Jack X. KaneH-Index: 7
#2David F. Chang (UCSF: University of California, San Francisco)H-Index: 33
The refractive outcome of cataract surgery is influenced by the choice of intraocular lens (IOL) power formula and the accuracy of the various devices used to measure the eye (including intraoperative aberrometry [IA]). This review aimed to cover the breadth of literature over the previous 10 years, focusing on 3 main questions: (1) What IOL power formulas currently are available and which is the most accurate? (2) What biometry devices are available, do the measurements they obtain differ from ...
4 CitationsSource