Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects

Volume: 4, Issue: 4, Pages: 423 - 434
Published: Dec 23, 2019
Abstract
Many researchers rely on meta-analysis to summarize research evidence. However, there is a concern that publication bias and selective reporting may lead to biased meta-analytic effect sizes. We compare the results of meta-analyses to large-scale preregistered replications in psychology carried out at multiple laboratories. The multiple-laboratory replications provide precisely estimated effect sizes that do not suffer from publication bias or...
Paper Details
Title
Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects
Published Date
Dec 23, 2019
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
423 - 434
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.