Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners
Abstract
This report aims to provide methodological guidance to help practitioners select the most appropriate weighting method based on propensity scores for their analysis out of many available options (eg, inverse probability treatment weights, standardised mortality ratio weights, fine stratification weights, overlap weights, and matching weights), and outlines recommendations for transparent reporting of studies using weighting based on the...
Paper Details
Title
Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners
Published Date
Oct 23, 2019
Journal
Pages
l5657 - l5657
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History