How Terrorism Red Flags Become Weak Signals Through the Processes of Judgement and Evaluation

Volume: 35, Issue: 3, Pages: 377 - 388
Published: Sep 10, 2019
Abstract
This paper addresses the question of why, in spite of their characteristics as ‘strong signals’, terrorism red flags can sometimes be missed. This represents a serious problem for counter-terrorism. By analysing the two phases of the investigative decision-making process, judgement and evaluation, we explain how the decision-making process can introduce distortions that can weaken even the strongest signals, making them vulnerable to being...
Paper Details
Title
How Terrorism Red Flags Become Weak Signals Through the Processes of Judgement and Evaluation
Published Date
Sep 10, 2019
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
377 - 388
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.