Neural dynamics of spreading attentional labels in mental contour tracing.

Published on Nov 1, 2019in Neural Networks8.05
· DOI :10.1016/J.NEUNET.2019.07.016
Mateja Marić1
Estimated H-index: 1
(University of Rijeka),
Dražen Domijan4
Estimated H-index: 4
(University of Rijeka)
Sources
Abstract
Abstract Behavioral and neural data suggest that visual attention spreads along contour segments to bind them into a unified object representation. Such attentional labeling segregates the target contour from distractors in a process known as mental contour tracing. A recurrent competitive map is developed to simulate the dynamics of mental contour tracing. In the model, local excitation opposes global inhibition and enables enhanced activity to propagate on the path offered by the contour. The extent of local excitatory interactions is modulated by the output of the multi-scale contour detection network, which constrains the speed of activity spreading in a scale-dependent manner. Furthermore, an L-junction detection network enables tracing to switch direction at the L-junctions, but not at the X- or T-junctions, thereby preventing spillover to a distractor contour. Computer simulations reveal that the model exhibits a monotonic increase in tracing time as a function of the distance to be traced. Also, the speed of tracing increases with decreasing proximity to the distractor contour and with the reduced curvature of the contours. The proposed model demonstrated how an elaborated version of the winner-takes-all network can implement a complex cognitive operation such as contour tracing.
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
References106
Newest
#1John K. Tsotsos (York University)H-Index: 58
#2Iuliia Kotseruba (York University)H-Index: 12
Last. Markus D. Solbach (York University)H-Index: 5
view all 4 authors...
It is almost universal to regard attention as the facility that permits an agent, human or machine, to give priority processing resources to relevant stimuli while ignoring the irrelevant. The reality of how this might manifest itself throughout all the forms of perceptual and cognitive processes possessed by humans, however, is not as clear. Here, we examine this reality with a broad perspective in order to highlight the myriad ways that attentional processes impact both perception and cognitio...
Source
#1Mateja Marić (University of Rijeka)H-Index: 1
#2Dražen Domijan (University of Rijeka)H-Index: 4
Huang and Pashler [2007, Psychological Review, 114(3), 599-631] suggested that feature-based attention creates a special form of spatial representation, which is termed a Boolean map. It partitions the visual scene into two distinct and complementary regions: selected and not selected. Here, we developed a model of a recurrent competitive network that is capable of state-dependent computation. It selects multiple winning locations based on a joint top-down cue. We augmented a model of the WTA ci...
Source
#1Jacob Beck (York University)H-Index: 8
#2Keith A. Schneider (York University)H-Index: 16
Source
#1Ian Donovan (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 5
#2Jay Pratt (U of T: University of Toronto)H-Index: 57
Last. Sarah Shomstein (GW: George Washington University)H-Index: 19
view all 3 authors...
Attentional selection is a dynamic process that relies on multiple types of representations. That object representations contribute to attentional selection has been known for decades; however, most evidence for this contribution has been gleaned from studies that have relied on various forms of spatial cueing (some endogenous and some exogenous). It has thus remained unclear whether object-based attentional selection is a direct result of spatial cuing, or whether it still emerges without any s...
Source
#1E. V. Levichkina (University of Melbourne)H-Index: 6
#2Yuri B. Saalmann (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 17
Last. Trichur R. Vidyasagar (University of Melbourne)H-Index: 36
view all 3 authors...
Abstract Primate posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is known to be involved in controlling spatial attention. Neurons in one part of the PPC, the lateral intraparietal area (LIP), show enhanced responses to objects at attended locations. Although many are selective for object features, such as the orientation of a visual stimulus, it is not clear how LIP circuits integrate feature‐selective information when providing attentional feedback about behaviorally relevant locations to the visual cortex. W...
Source
#1Richard VealeH-Index: 5
#2Ziad M. Hafed (University of Tübingen)H-Index: 29
Last. Masatoshi Yoshida (Graduate University for Advanced Studies)H-Index: 16
view all 3 authors...
Inherent in visual scene analysis is a bottleneck associated with the need to sequentially sample locations with foveating eye movements. The concept of a ‘saliency map’ topographically encoding st...
Source
#1Pieter R. Roelfsema (Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience)H-Index: 71
#2Floris P. de Lange (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 55
Neurons in early visual cortical areas not only represent incoming visual information but are also engaged by higher level cognitive processes, including attention, working memory, imagery, and decision-making. Are these cognitive effects an epiphenomenon or are they functionally relevant for these mental operations? We review evidence supporting the hypothesis that the modulation of activity in early visual areas has a causal role in cognition. The modulatory influences allow the early visual c...
Source
Oscillatory activity in the gamma range (30–100 Hz, see further below) has repeatedly been proposed as a modality of cognitive operations in the cortex on account of its covariation with a number of cognitive variables. I recently reviewed this literature (Merker, 2013), concluding that the evidence is compatible with a far more modest view of the functional role of gamma, long known to result from the need to balance excitation with inhibition during cortical activation (Bartos et al., 2007). G...
Source
#1Danique Jeurissen (KNAW: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences)H-Index: 9
#2Matthew W. Self (KNAW: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences)H-Index: 14
Last. Pieter R. Roelfsema (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 71
view all 3 authors...
When we look at an object, we perceive it as a whole. However, this is not how the brain processes objects. Instead, cells at early stages of the visual system respond selectively to single features of the object, such as edges. Moreover, each cell responds to its target feature in only a small region of space known as its receptive field. At higher levels of the visual system, cells respond to more complex features: angles rather than edges, for example. The receptive fields of the cells are al...
Source
#1Huihui Zhou (CAS: Chinese Academy of Sciences)H-Index: 13
#2Robert J. Schafer (McGovern Institute for Brain Research)H-Index: 9
Last. Robert Desimone (McGovern Institute for Brain Research)H-Index: 93
view all 3 authors...
Summary The ventro-lateral pulvinar is reciprocally connected with the visual areas of the ventral stream that are important for object recognition. To understand the mechanisms of attentive stimulus processing in this pulvinar-cortex loop, we investigated the interactions between the pulvinar, area V4, and IT cortex in a spatial-attention task. Sensory processing and the influence of attention in the pulvinar appeared to reflect its cortical inputs. However, pulvinar deactivation led to a reduc...
Source
Cited By0
Newest
This website uses cookies.
We use cookies to improve your online experience. By continuing to use our website we assume you agree to the placement of these cookies.
To learn more, you can find in our Privacy Policy.