Navigating successful confrontations: What should I say and how should I say it?

Published on Jan 1, 2019
· DOI :10.1016/B978-0-12-814715-3.00006-0
Margo J. Monteith29
Estimated H-index: 29
(Purdue University),
Mason D. Burns5
Estimated H-index: 5
(UIndy: University of Indianapolis),
Laura K. Hildebrand2
Estimated H-index: 2
(Purdue University)
Abstract People often wonder what to say and how to say it during confrontable moments. Through our review and organization of relevant research, we present a “roadmap” for navigating successful confrontations. To prepare for confrontable moments, we argue that people can receive “drivers training” (e.g., to increase bias literacy) and “pack appropriately for the trip” (e.g., bringing optimism). After encountering a confrontable moment, would-be confronters can head directly into a confrontation and approach the ultimate destination of reducing others’ bias. Or, confronters may make a “pit stop” to take advantage of strategies that may help them to preserve positive impressions of themselves in others’ eyes. We review many factors that influence the likelihood of preserving positive impressions and reducing others’ biases, including “road hazards” that are likely to lead to undesired outcomes. Ultimately, this chapter highlights how successful confrontations can be achieved when they are appropriately navigated.
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
6 Citations
1 Author (Clive Lewis)
Cited By5
#1Julie A. Woodzicka (W&L: Washington and Lee University)H-Index: 13
#2Jessica J. Good (Davidson College)H-Index: 13
Confronting sexism has been routinely operationalized in experimental research as assertive behavior that expresses disapproval of sexism. The present research examines an indirect confrontation st...
1 CitationsSource
#1Mason D. Burns (UIndy: University of Indianapolis)H-Index: 5
#2Erica L. Granz (UIndy: University of Indianapolis)
Relative to confrontations of other forms of prejudice and stereotyping, confronting gender stereotypes can be challenging, in part, because recipients may be unlikely to accept such feedback. Given the importance of accepting negative feedback in the promotion of reparative efforts, the present research investigated how to frame confrontations of gender stereotyping to be more readily accepted. Across three experiments (131 and 247 U.S. undergraduates; 174 U.S. MTurk workers), we investigated h...
#1Jessica J. Good (Davidson College)H-Index: 13
#2Julie A. Woodzicka (W&L: Washington and Lee University)H-Index: 13
Last. Kimberly A. Bourne (UW: University of Washington)H-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...
Research on confronting prejudice frequently defines an effective confrontation as one that induces change in the perpetrator's prejudicial beliefs or actions. We argue for a broader definition, defining successful confrontation as one that elicits the confronter's desired response. Using a community sample of 152 adults, we conducted an exploratory study in which participants recalled a time when they had confronted racism or sexism. Results revealed a frequent mismatch between what confronters...
Nov 8, 2020 in FSE (Foundations of Software Engineering)
#1Yi WangH-Index: 8
#2Min Zhang (ECNU: East China Normal University)H-Index: 14
The software development profession suffers from severe gender biases, which could be explicit and implicit. However, SE literature has not systematically explored and evaluated the methods for reducing gender biases, especially for implicit gender biases. This paper reports on a field experiment to examine whether the intergroup contact theory could reduce implicit gender biases in software development. In the field experiment, 280 undergraduate students taking a project-centric introductory so...
6 CitationsSource
#1Julie A. Woodzicka (W&L: Washington and Lee University)H-Index: 13
#2Robyn K. Mallett (LUC: Loyola University Chicago)H-Index: 21
Last. Kala J. Melchiori (JMU: James Madison University)H-Index: 4
view all 3 authors...