Improved False-Positive Rates and the Overestimation of Unintended Harm from Lung Cancer Screening
Abstract
Concern over high false-positive rates and the potential for unintended harm to patients is a critical component of the lack of widespread adoption of lung cancer screening. An institutional database was used to identify patients who underwent lung cancer screening between 2/2015 and 2/2018 at Rush University Medical Center and Rush Oak Park Hospital. Reads were executed by dedicated thoracic radiologists and communicated using the Lung Imaging...
Paper Details
Title
Improved False-Positive Rates and the Overestimation of Unintended Harm from Lung Cancer Screening
Published Date
Apr 12, 2019
Journal
Volume
197
Issue
3
Pages
327 - 332
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History