Ceding and Succeeding: How the Altruistic Can Benefit from the Selfish in Joint Decisions

Published on Oct 1, 2019in Journal of Consumer Psychology
· DOI :10.1002/JCPY.1108
Michael Lowe5
Estimated H-index: 5
(Georgia Institute of Technology),
Hristina Nikolova6
Estimated H-index: 6
(BC: Boston College)
+ 1 AuthorsSara Loughran Dommer4
Estimated H-index: 4
(Georgia Institute of Technology)
Sources
Abstract
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
2 Citations
2 Citations
References39
Newest
#1Hristina Nikolova (BC: Boston College)H-Index: 6
#2Cait Lamberton (University of Pittsburgh)H-Index: 18
Last. Nicole Verrochi Coleman (University of Pittsburgh)H-Index: 8
view all 3 authors...
13 CitationsSource
#1Hristina Nikolova (BC: Boston College)H-Index: 6
#2Cait Lamberton (University of Pittsburgh)H-Index: 18
Individual decision makers show robust tendencies toward choosing compromise options. But what happens when consumers make choices with someone else? This article examines the choice of compromise options in joint dyadic decisions. Findings reveal that preferences for compromise alternatives replicate in mixed-gender and female-female dyads as among individuals but are attenuated when two males make a choice together. Moreover, when two males make joint choices, their tendency to choose the comp...
17 CitationsSource
#1Hristina Dzhogleva (BC: Boston College)H-Index: 1
#2Cait Lamberton (University of Pittsburgh)H-Index: 18
Can we rely on our high self-control friends to help us make better joint spending and diet decisions? The current research reports seven studies showing that in joint decisions, homogeneous high self-control pairs make less indulgent choices than both homogeneous low self-control and mixed pairs. However, there is no difference in the self-regulatory patterns of the latter two dyad types: having one high self-control partner in a dyad does not lead to more restraint than having none. The author...
45 CitationsSource
#1Michael Lowe (A&M: Texas A&M University)H-Index: 5
#2Kelly L. Haws (Vandy: Vanderbilt University)H-Index: 24
Although most consumer self-control decisions are made individually, they are rarely made in isolation. Temptations are often simultaneously encountered by multiple members of a group or dyad and thereby susceptible to social influence. However, little is known about these "parallel" self-control decisions or the resulting social consequences. In a series of studies spanning the domains of money, time management, and food consumption, consumers demonstrated a tendency to bond over matched self-c...
30 CitationsSource
#1Stephen A. Spiller (UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles)H-Index: 10
#2Gavan J. Fitzsimons (Duke University)H-Index: 43
Last. Gary H. McClelland (CU: University of Colorado Boulder)H-Index: 28
view all 4 authors...
Abstract It is common for researchers discovering a significant interaction of a measured variable X with a manipulated variable Z to examine simple effects of Z at different levels of X. These “spotlight” tests are often misunderstood even in the simplest cases, and it appears that consumer researchers are unsure how to extend them to more complex designs. The authors explain the general principles of spotlight tests, show that they rely on familiar regression techniques, and provide a tutorial...
878 CitationsSource
#1Margarita Gorlin (Yale University)H-Index: 5
#2Ravi Dhar (Yale University)H-Index: 66
Most choice research has studied how people make decisions within a narrowly defined choice context and has not paid sufficient attention to the role of social context. We commend Simpson, Griskevicius, and Rothman for directing the attention of choice researchers to the study of joint decision making and current theories on relationships. Building on SGR, we propose that a relationship partner's influence varies with the type of decision at hand and with situational factors. We propose four pos...
26 CitationsSource
#1Jeffry A. Simpson (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 93
#2Vladas Griskevicius (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 54
Last. Alexander J. Rothman (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 64
view all 3 authors...
Abstract Most research on consumer choice assumes that decisions are usually made by individuals, and that these decisions are based on an individual's personal attitudes, beliefs, and preferences. Yet, much consumer behavior—from joint decisions to individual choices—is directly or indirectly shaped by people with whom we have some relationship. In this target article, we examine how each member in a relationship can affect how consumer decisions are made. After reviewing foundational work in t...
69 CitationsSource
#1Ryan O. Murphy (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 16
#2Kurt A. Ackermann (ETH Zurich)H-Index: 6
Last. Michel J. J. Handgraaf (Columbia University)H-Index: 19
view all 3 authors...
Narrow self-interest is often used as a simplifying assumption when studying people making decisions in social contexts. Nonetheless, people exhibit a wide range of different motivations when choosing unilaterally among interdependent outcomes. Measuring the magnitude of the concern people have for others, sometimes called Social Value Orientation (SVO), has been an interest of many social scientists for decades and several different measurement methods have been developed so far. Here we introd...
450 CitationsSource
#1Robert J. Fisher (U of A: University of Alberta)H-Index: 32
#2Yany Grégoire (HEC Montréal)H-Index: 20
Last. Kyle B. MurrayH-Index: 18
view all 3 authors...
We conduct three experiments in which participants in dyads choose between two restaurants, each of which is preferred by only one participant, and one participant has the power to decide which restaurant both will patronize. We find that the power to make a joint decision increases satisfaction with the choice only when those involved have a competitive decision orientation, a weak or anonymous relationship, and the outcome they choose is subsequently available. Participants who have a cooperat...
10 CitationsSource
#1Nicole L. Mead (Tilburg University)H-Index: 13
#2Roy F. Baumeister (FSU: Florida State University)H-Index: 173
Last. Kathleen D. VohsH-Index: 91
view all 5 authors...
When people's deeply ingrained need for social connection is thwarted by social exclusion, profound psychological consequences ensue. Despite the fact that social connections and consumption are central facets of daily life, little empirical attention has been devoted to understanding how belongingness threats affect consumer behavior. In four experiments, we tested the hypothesis that social exclusion causes people to spend and consume strategically in the service of affiliation. Relative to co...
286 CitationsSource
Cited By7
Newest
#1Peggy J. Liu (University of Pittsburgh)H-Index: 13
#2Theresa A. Kwon (University of Pittsburgh)
Abstract null null We present a three-dimensional what, how long, and how often framework to discuss three main inferences about other people’s preferences for repeated social interactions over time: (1) what to do together, (2) how long to spend together on each occasion, and (3) how often to spend time together. For each dimension, we discuss when and how people make inferences about other people’s preferences, as well as the consequences of making incorrect inferences. The three dimensions ar...
Source
#1Danielle J. Brick (UNH: University of New Hampshire)H-Index: 4
#2Lingrui Zhou (Duke University)
Last. Gavan J. Fitzsimons (Duke University)H-Index: 43
view all 4 authors...
1 CitationsSource
#1Joris Demmers (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 3
#2Andrea Weihrauch (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 1
Last. Frauke Mattison Thompson (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 7
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Gretchen R Ross (TCU: Texas Christian University)H-Index: 1
#2Margaret G. Meloy (PSU: Pennsylvania State University)H-Index: 16
Last. Lisa E. Bolton (PSU: Pennsylvania State University)H-Index: 17
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Ryan HamiltonH-Index: 13
#2Rosellina FerraroH-Index: 11
Last. Anirban MukhopadhyayH-Index: 16
view all 4 authors...
When customers journey from a need to a purchase decision and beyond, they rarely do so alone. This article introduces the social customer journey, which extends prior perspectives on the path to p...
21 CitationsSource
Consumers frequently make choices and purchase products for other people (e.g., buying a gift for a friend). While extant research identified many factors that influence how choices for others are made, much of this literature focused on product-specific factors or motivations pertaining to the process of exchange to understand choice-for-others phenomena. Little is known about the influence of consumer-relevant factors on choices made for other people. In the current research we examine how cho...
4 CitationsSource
This research introduces a framework wherein consumers take on “requestor” or “responder” roles in making joint consumption decisions. The authors document a robust preference expression asymmetry ...
2 CitationsSource