Cataract risk in US radiologic technologists assisting with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a retrospective cohort study.

Published on May 1, 2019in Occupational and Environmental Medicine3.824
· DOI :10.1136/OEMED-2018-105360
Raquel Velazquez-Kronen4
Estimated H-index: 4
,
David Borrego8
Estimated H-index: 8
(HHS: United States Department of Health and Human Services)
+ 12 AuthorsAmy E. Millen35
Estimated H-index: 35
(SUNY: State University of New York System)
Sources
Abstract
Objectives To assess radiation exposure-related work history and risk of cataract and cataract surgery among radiologic technologists assisting with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures (FGIP). Methods This retrospective study included 35 751 radiologic technologists who reported being cataract-free at baseline (1994–1998) and completed a follow-up questionnaire (2013–2014). Frequencies of assisting with 21 types of FGIP and use of radiation protection equipment during five time periods (before 1970, 1970–1979, 1980–1989, 1990–1999, 2000–2009) were derived from an additional self-administered questionnaire in 2013–2014. Multivariable-adjusted relative risks (RRs) for self-reported cataract diagnosis and cataract surgery were estimated according to FGIP work history. Results During follow-up, 9372 technologists reported incident physician-diagnosed cataract; 4278 of incident cases reported undergoing cataract surgery. Technologists who ever assisted with FGIP had increased risk for cataract compared with those who never assisted with FGIP (RR: 1.18, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.25). Risk increased with increasing cumulative number of FGIP; the RR for technologists who assisted with >5000 FGIP compared with those who never assisted was 1.38 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.53; p trend 3 feet (>0.9 m) (RRs for >5000 at ≤3 feet vs never FGIP were 1.48, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.74 and 1.15, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.35, respectively; pdifference=0.04). Similar risks, although not statistically significant, were observed for cataract surgery. Conclusion Technologists who reported assisting with FGIP, particularly high-volume FGIP within 3 feet of the patient, had increased risk of incident cataract. Additional investigation should evaluate estimated dose response and medically validated cataract type.
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
51 Citations
9 Citations
8 Citations
References29
Newest
#1Mark P. Little (NIH: National Institutes of Health)H-Index: 59
#2Cari M. Kitahara (NIH: National Institutes of Health)H-Index: 29
Last. Craig Meyer (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 8
view all 14 authors...
It has long been known that relatively high-dose ionising radiation exposure (> 1 Gy) can induce cataract, but there has been no evidence that this occurs at low doses (< 100 mGy). To assess low-dose risk, participants from the US Radiologic Technologists Study, a large, prospective cohort, were followed from date of mailed questionnaire survey completed during 1994–1998 to the earliest of self-reported diagnosis of cataract/cataract surgery, cancer other than non-melanoma skin, or date of last ...
28 CitationsSource
#1P. Ortiz LópezH-Index: 5
#2Lawrence T. DauerH-Index: 28
Last. Craig YoderH-Index: 2
view all 10 authors...
Abstract: In recent publications, such as Publications 117 and 120, the Commission provided practical advice for physicians and other healthcare personnel on measures to protect their patients and themselves during interventional procedures. These measures can only be effective if they are encompassed by a framework of radiological protection elements, and by the availability of professionals with responsibilities in radiological protection. This framework includes a radiological protection prog...
60 CitationsSource
#1Aris Karatasakis (UTSW: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)H-Index: 19
Last. Emmanouil S. Brilakis (UTSW: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)H-Index: 69
view all 15 authors...
Objective To examine the relationship between occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and the prevalence of lens changes in interventional cardiologists (ICs) and catheterization laboratory (“cath-lab”) staff. Background Exposure to ionizing radiation is associated with the development of lens opacities. ICs and cath-lab staff can receive high doses of ionizing radiation without protection, and may thus be at risk for lens opacity formation. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study at an...
23 CitationsSource
#2Neige Journy (Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire)H-Index: 6
Last. Cari M. Kitahara (NIH: National Institutes of Health)H-Index: 29
view all 7 authors...
Study results indicated an increased risk of cataract in a population of medical workers performing nuclear medicine procedures who were followed up during the period from the completion of the third cohort survey in the years 2003—2005 to the completion of the fourth survey in the years 2012—2013.
11 CitationsSource
#1P Hu (Fudan University)H-Index: 2
#2Yan Kong (Fudan University)H-Index: 4
Last. Haikuan Liu (Fudan University)H-Index: 7
view all 6 authors...
Abstract To study the shielding effect of radiologists' eye lens with lead glasses of different equivalent thicknesses and sizes in interventional radiology procedures. Using the human voxel phantom with a more accurate model of the eye and MCNPX software, eye lens doses of the radiologists who wearing different kinds of lead glasses were simulated, different beam projections were taken into consideration during the simulation. Measurements were also performed with the physical model to verify s...
15 CitationsSource
#1Julie C. Lim (University of Auckland)H-Index: 15
#2Ankita Umapathy (University of Auckland)H-Index: 5
Last. Paul J. Donaldson (University of Auckland)H-Index: 30
view all 3 authors...
Cataract is the leading cause of blindness worldwide and accounts for approximately half of all forms of vision loss. Currently, the only way to treat cataracts is by surgery. However, with an ageing population, the demand for surgery and the need for cost effective alternative solutions grows exponentially. To reduce the need for cataract surgery, alternative medical therapies to delay cataracts are urgently required. However, given the difficulty in accessing human cataract lenses, investigati...
18 CitationsSource
Background— Orthopedic strain and radiation exposure are recognized risk factors in personnel staff performing fluoroscopically guided cardiovascular procedures. However, the potential occupational health effects are still unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of health problems among personnel staff working in interventional cardiology/cardiac electrophysiology and correlate them with the length of occupational radiation exposure. Methods and Results— We used a self-a...
104 CitationsSource
#1Steven L. Simon (NIH: National Institutes of Health)H-Index: 25
#2Dale L. PrestonH-Index: 63
Last. Michele M. Doody (NIH: National Institutes of Health)H-Index: 51
view all 15 authors...
In this article, we describe recent methodological enhancements and findings from the dose reconstruction component of a study of health risks among U.S. radiologic technologists. An earlier version of the dosimetry published in 2006 used physical and statistical models, literature-reported exposure measurements for the years before 1960, and archival personnel monitoring badge data from cohort members through 1984. The data and models previously described were used to estimate annual occupation...
47 CitationsSource
#1Richard Baum (Brigham and Women's Hospital)H-Index: 58
#2Stanley Baum (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 9
The evolution of modern interventional radiology began over half century ago with a simple question. Was it possible to use the same diagnostic imaging tools that had revolutionized the practice of medicine to guide the real-time treatment of disease? This disruptive concept led to rapid treatment advances in every organ system of the body. It became clear that by utilizing imaging some patients could undergo targeted procedures, eliminating the need for major surgery, while others could undergo...
23 CitationsSource
#1G. Emmett Lynskey (Georgetown University)H-Index: 1
#2Daniel K. Powell (Beth Israel Medical Center)H-Index: 8
Last. James E. Silberzweig (Beth Israel Medical Center)H-Index: 13
view all 4 authors...
Abstract Purpose To assess attitudes of interventional radiologists toward personal radiation protection and the use of radiation protection devices. Materials and Methods Invitations to an anonymous online survey that comprised eight questions focused on operator attitudes toward radiation protection devices were sent via e-mail to the active membership of the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR): a total of 3,158 e-mail invitations. A single reminder e-mail was sent. Results There were 50...
34 CitationsSource
Cited By7
Newest
#1Beth A. Schueler (Mayo Clinic)H-Index: 32
#2Kenneth A. Fetterly (Mayo Clinic)H-Index: 18
Data suggest that radiation-induced cataracts may form without a threshold and at low-radiation doses. Staff involved in interventional radiology and cardiology fluoroscopy-guided procedures have the potential to be exposed to radiation levels that may lead to eye lens injury and the occurrence of opacifications have been reported. Estimates of lens dose for various fluoroscopy procedures and predicted annual dosages have been provided in numerous publications. Available tools for eye lens radia...
1 CitationsSource
#1Martha S. LinetH-Index: 112
Last. James A. BrinkH-Index: 31
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Elizabeth A. Ainsbury (PHE: Public Health England)H-Index: 23
#2Claudia DalkeH-Index: 17
Last. Jean-René Jourdain (Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire)H-Index: 12
view all 12 authors...
Abstract In 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended reducing the occupational equivalent dose limit for the lens of the eye from 150 mSv/year to 20 mSv/year, averaged over five years, with no single year exceeding 50 mSv. With this recommendation, several important assumptions were made, such as lack of dose rate effect, classification of cataracts as a tissue reaction with a dose threshold at 0.5 Gy, and progression of minor opacities into vision-impairi...
4 CitationsSource
#1M Psarras (UoA: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens)H-Index: 1
#2Agapi Ploussi (UoA: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens)H-Index: 8
Last. Efstathios P. Efstathopoulos (UoA: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens)H-Index: 26
view all 10 authors...
The aim of the study was to measure and evaluate the radiation dose to the eye lens and forehead of interventional radiologists (IRs). The study included 96 procedures (lower-limb percutaneous transluminal angioplasties, embolisations/chemoembolisations and vertebroplasties) performed by 6 IRs. A set of seven thermoluminescence dosemeters was allocated to each physician. The highest dose per procedure was found for the left eye lens of the primary operator in vertebroplasties (1576 μSv). Left an...
1 CitationsSource
#1Rouven Kubicki (University of Freiburg)H-Index: 3
#2Johanna Hummel (University of Freiburg)H-Index: 3
Last. Jochen Grohmann (University of Freiburg)H-Index: 14
view all 6 authors...
Objectives To assess the potential occupational radiation reduction and technical feasibility in patients rotated 180° (upside-down) when requiring neck access for transcervical or trans-subclavian catheterisation. Methods Upside-down positioning is defined as rotating patients in supine position by 180°, so that the feet come to rest where the head would otherwise be. We retrospectively evaluated all these procedures performed between March 2016 and May 2019. Furthermore, two different phantoms...
Source
By using data from the largest dosimetry provider in the United States, occupational doses to medical staff performing or assisting with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures in 2009, 2...
11 CitationsSource
#1Mohsen ShafieeH-Index: 2
#2Razieh Rashidfar (Shiraz University of Medical Sciences)H-Index: 1
Last. Kheibar Dashtian (Yasouj University)H-Index: 34
view all 6 authors...
Objective: Ionizing radiation has been extensively used in medical procedures throughout the world. Such interventional radiological procedures could result in occupational exposure that needs urgent control. Therefore, MPs (medical professionals) should receive education and appropriate training on occupational radiation protection. In this context, the present study is aimed to investigate the MPs' knowledge and practice regarding radiation protection principles during interventional radiologi...
2 CitationsSource