The bat-and-ball problem: Stronger evidence in support of a conscious error process.

Volume: 6, Issue: 4, Pages: 369 - 380
Published: Oct 1, 2019
Abstract
Traditional accounts of reasoning have characterized human error response to be an unconscious process whereby cognitive misers blindly neglect the critical information that would lead to problem solution, thereby substituting an easier problem for the actual problem (e.g., Kahneman & Frederick, 2002). For the bat-and-ball problem, the unconscious substitution hypothesis is challenged on two fronts in the present study: (1) testing for conscious...
Paper Details
Title
The bat-and-ball problem: Stronger evidence in support of a conscious error process.
Published Date
Oct 1, 2019
Journal
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
369 - 380
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.