Quality Assurance Peer Review of Head and Neck Contours in a Large Cancer Centre via a Weekly Meeting Approach
Abstract
Aims To assess the impact of weekly scheduled peer review of head and neck contours for definitive and adjuvant radiotherapy cases based on rates of recommended changes. Materials and methods Retrospective analysis of a prospective database. Recommended changes were prospectively classified as ‘major’ (change in gross tumour volume and/or high-dose clinical target volume, dose/fractionation) or ‘minor’ (change in intermediate or elective dose...
Paper Details
Title
Quality Assurance Peer Review of Head and Neck Contours in a Large Cancer Centre via a Weekly Meeting Approach
Published Date
Jun 1, 2019
Journal
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
344 - 351
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History