Machine learning

Microeconomics

Appropriation

Philosophy

Economics

Monopoly

Market economy

Capitalism

Politics

Economic rent

Marxist philosophy

Political science

Financialization

Value (mathematics)

Computer science

Linguistics

Neoclassical economics

Sociology

Intellectual property

Social science

Commodity

Technoscience

Surplus value

Property rights

Science Technology & Human Values

Contemporary, technoscientific capitalism is characterized by the (re)configuration of a range of “things” (e.g., infrastructure, data, knowledge, bodies) as assets or capitalized property. Accumulation strategies have changed as a result of this assetization process. Rather than entrepreneurial strategies based on commodity production, technoscientific capitalism is increasingly underpinned by rentiership or the appropriation of value through ownership and control rights (e.g., intellectual property [IP]), monopoly conditions, and regulatory or market devices and practices (e.g., investment dispute courts, exclusivity agreements). While rentiership is often presented as a negative phenomenon (e.g., distorting markets, unearned income) in both neoclassical and Marxist political economy literatures—and much in between—in this paper, I conceptualize rentiership as a technoeconomic practice and process framed by insights from science and technology studies (STS). So, rather than a problematic “side effect” of capitalism, the concept of rentiership enables us to understand how different forms of value extraction constitute, and are constituted by, different forms of technoscience. This allows STS to contribute a distinctive analytical approach to ongoing debates in political economy about economic rents and rent-seeking.

Technoscience Rent: Toward a Theory of<i>Rentiership</i>for Technoscientific Capitalism

Technoscience Rent: Toward a Theory ofRentiershipfor Technoscientific Capitalism