Systematic review of the quantity and quality of randomized clinical trials in pancreatic surgery
Abstract
Background RCTs are considered the reference standard in clinical research. However, surgical RCTs pose specific challenges and therefore numbers have been lower than those for randomized trials of medical interventions. In addition, surgical trials have often been associated with poor methodological quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the evolution of quantity and quality of RCTs in pancreatic surgery and to identify evidence...
Paper Details
Title
Systematic review of the quantity and quality of randomized clinical trials in pancreatic surgery
Published Date
Dec 24, 2018
Journal
Volume
106
Issue
1
Pages
23 - 31
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History