When and why performance goals predict exploitation behaviors: An achievement goal complex analysis of the selection function of assessment

Published on Apr 1, 2019in Motivation and Emotion
· DOI :10.1007/S11031-018-9742-Y
Nicolas Sommet8
Estimated H-index: 8
(UNIL: University of Lausanne),
David Nguyen6
Estimated H-index: 6
(EPFL: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)
+ 4 AuthorsFabrizio Butera33
Estimated H-index: 33
(UNIL: University of Lausanne)
Sources
Abstract
We adopted an achievement goal complex framework (studying achievement goals and reasons connected to goals) to determine when and why performance goals predict exploitation of others’ knowledge. We hypothesized that: (i) when selective assessment is used (exams aiming to select a limited number of individuals), the link between performance goals and exploitation orientation is stronger; (ii) the reason why is that selective assessment fosters performance goals regulated by controlled reasons. Study 1 (N = 166) supported these hypotheses in a “real world” environment, comparing students enrolled in programs using non-selective versus selective assessment (but having a majority of common courses). Then, an experimental causal-chain-like design was used. In Study 2 (N = 187), presenting an intelligence test as selective (vs. [self-]evaluative) predicted controlled reasons connected to performance goals. In Study 3 (N = 192), inducing performance goals using controlling (vs. autonomy-supportive) language predicted exploitation orientation, indirectly impairing information-sharing behaviors. The results contribute to the understanding of both the structural antecedents and interpersonal consequences of achievement goal complexes.
Figures & Tables
Download
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
39 Citations
2 Citations
62 Citations
References76
Newest
#1Martin Daumiller (University of Augsburg)H-Index: 7
#2Oliver Dickhäuser (UMA: University of Mannheim)H-Index: 34
Last. Markus Dresel (University of Augsburg)H-Index: 19
view all 3 authors...
Achievement goals of university instructors for teaching were examined. We investigated the structure of these goals, the stability of this structure across different groups of instructors, and the relations of these goals to teaching-related outcomes. Achievement goals, positive affect, attitudes toward help, and self-reported teaching quality were assessed in a sample of 1,066 German university instructors from three different status groups (221 full professors, 370 postdoc staff members, 427 ...
40 CitationsSource
#1Ching-Huei Chen (NCUE: National Changhua University of Education)H-Index: 17
#2Victor Law (UNM: University of New Mexico)H-Index: 9
Last. Wei Yu Chen (Asia University (Japan))H-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...
ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study is to examine the effects of different modes of competition on science learning in a game-based learning (GBL) environment. Some key motivational constructs such as learning goals, performance goals, and perceived ability were also investigated. One hundred ninety-five students from a secondary school in Taiwan were randomly assigned to three conditions (anonymous competition, non-anonymous competition, and a control group) in a GBL environment to learn the conc...
13 CitationsSource
#1Jongho Shin (SNU: Seoul National University)H-Index: 9
#2You-kyung Lee (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 5
Last. Eunjin Seo (University of Texas at Austin)H-Index: 6
view all 3 authors...
Abstract The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of reference of comparison (i.e., self-referential vs. normative) and regulatory focus (i.e., promotion vs. prevention) on students' subsequent achievement goals. We hypothesized that the negative effect of normative feedback on students' achievement goals would decrease or disappear when the feedback is promotion focused. The results from an experimental study (n = 155 sixth and seventh graders) supported the hypothesis. In gen...
14 CitationsSource
#1Corwin Senko (SUNY: State University of New York System)H-Index: 14
#2Blair Dawson (SUNY: State University of New York System)H-Index: 1
Achievement goal theory originally defined performance-approach goals as striving to demonstrate competence to outsiders by outperforming peers. The research, however, has operationalized the goals inconsistently, emphasizing the competence demonstration element in some cases and the peer comparison element in others. A meta-analysis by Hulleman et al. (2010) discovered that students’ academic achievement was negatively predicted by performance-approach goals that focus on appearing talented, bu...
65 CitationsSource
#1Nicolas Sommet (UNIL: University of Lausanne)H-Index: 8
#2Vincent Pillaud (UNIL: University of Lausanne)H-Index: 3
Last. Fabrizio Butera (UNIL: University of Lausanne)H-Index: 33
view all 4 authors...
Abstract How are competitive goals transmitted over time? As most competence-relevant contexts (e.g., school) are hierarchy-relevant (e.g., teacher/students), supervisors’ performance-approach goals (desire to outperform others) should play a major role. We formulated a performance goals socialization hypothesis: The higher a supervisor’s performance-approach goals, the stronger the effects of time on followers’ performance-approach and -avoidance (desire not to be outperformed by others) goals....
1 CitationsSource
#1Nicolas Sommet (UNIL: University of Lausanne)H-Index: 8
#2Andrew J. ElliotH-Index: 109
In the present research, we proposed a systematic approach to disentangling the shared and unique variance explained by achievement goals, reasons for goal pursuit, and specific goal-reason combinations (i.e., achievement goal complexes). Four studies using this approach (involving nearly 1,800 participants) led to 3 basic sets of findings. First, when testing goals and reasons separately, mastery (-approach) goals and autonomous reasons explained variance in beneficial experiential (interest, s...
39 CitationsSource
#1Mickaël JuryH-Index: 6
#2Céline DarnonH-Index: 24
Last. Fabrizio Butera (UNIL: University of Lausanne)H-Index: 33
view all 4 authors...
According to the recent research, the educational system fulfills both an educational function (i.e., teaching and training students) and a selection function (i.e., determining students’ future position in the social hierarchy), particularly in higher education. It has been argued that in the university system the selection function provides a social utility value to performance-approach goals (i.e., the goal to demonstrate one’s own competences relative to others), which in turn increases the ...
8 CitationsSource
#1Moti Benita (University of Haifa)H-Index: 6
#2Noa Shane (BGU: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)H-Index: 2
Last. Guy Roth (BGU: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)H-Index: 19
view all 4 authors...
Two experimental studies using Elliot, Murayama, and Pekrun’s (Journal of Educational Psychology 103(3):632–648, 2011) differentiation between self-goals and task-goals, were conducted to examine the relative influence of achievement goals and motivational contexts on behavioral and emotional engagement. In Study 1, 133 college students were prompted to adopt self-goals (intrapersonal standards) or other-goals (performance standards) in one of two motivational contexts (autonomy-supportive or au...
10 CitationsSource
#1Corwin Senko (SUNY: State University of New York System)H-Index: 14
#2Katie L. Tropiano (SUNY: State University of New York System)H-Index: 1
Achievement goal theory (Dweck, 1986) initially characterized mastery goals and performance goals as opposites in a good–bad dualism of student motivation. A later revision (Harackiewicz, Barron, & Elliot, 1998) contended that both goals can provide benefits and be pursued together. Perhaps both frameworks are correct: Their contrasting views may stem from differences in how they define performance goals. The traditional framework favors a goal orientation model in which performance goals entail...
52 CitationsSource
#1Gavin J. Kilduff (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 12
#2Adam D. Galinsky (Columbia University)H-Index: 103
Last. J. James Reade (University of Reading)H-Index: 13
view all 4 authors...
We investigate rivalry as a driver of unethical behavior. We first distinguish it from general competition, both conceptually and in terms of its consequences for behavior. Then, across four experiments and one archival study, we find evidence that rivalry fuels greater unethical behavior than general competition. Specifically, rivalry was associated with increased Machiavellianism, over-reporting of performance, willingness to employ unethical negotiation tactics, and unsportsmanlike behavior. ...
115 CitationsSource
Cited By3
Newest
#1Céline BuchsH-Index: 15
Last. Fabrizio ButeraH-Index: 33
view all 4 authors...
A partner’s competence should logically favor cooperative learning. However, research in cooperative learning has shown that a partner’s competence may or may not activate a threatening social comparison and yields dual effects: It is beneficial when students work on complementary information while it is detrimental when students work on identical information. Two studies conducted at elementary school (study 1 with 24 fourth graders working on encyclopedic texts, and study 2 with 28 fifth grade...
Source
Although many studies endorse the notion that the way students perceive support influences their engagement, very few have explored the possible mediator role of intention to learn between these variables. The present work provides new evidence to the existing literature because it analyses the work of intention to learn (measured with expectancy–value beliefs and achievement goals) as a mediating motivational variable in the relation between university students’ external support (teacher and fa...
1 CitationsSource
#1Caroline Pulfrey (UNIL: University of Lausanne)H-Index: 10
#2Maarten Vansteenkiste (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 106
Last. Aikaterina Michou (Bilkent University)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
Combining principles of Achievement Goal Theory, which maintains that performance goals play a key role in individuals’ likelihood of cheating, and Self-Determination Theory, which highlights the importance of individuals’ reasons for adopting achievement goals, we examined whether the combination of experimentally inducing a performance-approach (relative to mastery-approach) goal, combined with controlled or pressured (instead of autonomous and volitional) reasons for goal adoption may incite ...
2 CitationsSource