Machine learning

Computational chemistry

Chemistry

Programming language

Crystal (programming language)

Engineering

Minification

Artificial intelligence

Limiting

Crystallography

Mathematics

Crystal structure prediction

Energy minimization

Class (philosophy)

Crystal structure

Computer science

Algorithm

Mechanical engineering

Chemistry of Materials

Predicting crystal structure has always been a challenging problem for physical sciences. Recently, computational methods have been built to predict crystal structure with success but have been limited in scope and computational time. In this paper, we review computational methods such as density functional theory and machine learning methods used to predict crystal structure. We also explored the breadth versus accuracy of building a model to predict across any crystal structure using machine learning. We extracted 24 913 unique chemical formulas existing between 290 and 310 K from the Pearson Crystal Database. Of these 24 913 formulas, there exists 10 711 unique crystal structures referred to as entry prototypes. Common entries might have hundreds of chemical compositions, while the vast majority of entry prototypes is represented by fewer than ten unique compositions. To include all data in our predictions, entry prototypes that lacked a minimum number of representatives were relabeled as "Other". By selecting the minimum numbers to be 150, 100, 70, 40, 20, and 10, we explored how limiting class sizes affected performance. Using each minimum number to reorganize the data, we looked at the classification performance metrics: accuracy, precision, and recall. Accuracy ranged from 97 ± 2 to 85 ± 2%; average precision ranged from 86 ± 2 to 79 ± 2%, while average recall ranged from 73 ± 2 to 54 ± 2% for minimum-class representatives from 150 to 10, respectively.

Machine Learning and Energy Minimization Approaches for Crystal Structure Predictions: A Review and New Horizons