Is overconfidence a motivated bias? Experimental evidence.

Published on Apr 5, 2018in Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
· DOI :10.1037/XGE0000500
Jennifer Marie Logg8
Estimated H-index: 8
(Harvard University),
Uriel Haran7
Estimated H-index: 7
(BGU: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev),
Don A. Moore53
Estimated H-index: 53
(University of California, Berkeley)
Sources
Abstract
: Are overconfident beliefs driven by the motivation to view oneself positively? We test the relationship between motivation and overconfidence using two distinct, but often conflated measures: better-than-average (BTA) beliefs and overplacement. Our results suggest that motivation can indeed affect these faces of overconfidence, but only under limited conditions. Whereas BTA beliefs are inflated by motivation, introducing some specificity and clarity to the standards of assessment (Experiment 1) or to the trait's definition (Experiments 2 and 3) reduces or eliminates this bias in judgment overall. We find stronger support for a cognitive explanation for overconfidence, which emphasizes the effect of task difficulty. The difficulty of possessing a desirable trait (Experiment 4) or succeeding on math and logic problems (Experiment 5) affects self-assessment more consistently than does motivation. Finally, we find the lack of an objective standard for vague traits allows people to create idiosyncratic definitions and view themselves as better than others in their own unique ways (Experiment 6). Overall, the results suggest motivation's effect on BTA beliefs is driven more by idiosyncratic construals of assessment than by self-enhancing delusion. They also suggest that by focusing on vague measures (BTA rather than overplacement) and vague traits, prior research may have exaggerated the role of motivation in overconfidence. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
3,657 Citations
68 Citations
References94
Newest
#1Don A. Moore (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 53
#2Elizabeth R. Tenney (UofU: University of Utah)H-Index: 15
Last. Uriel Haran (BGU: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)H-Index: 7
view all 3 authors...
58 CitationsSource
#1Patrick R. Heck (Brown University)H-Index: 7
#2Joachim I. Krueger (Brown University)H-Index: 51
Self-enhancement is a positive bias in self-perception, which may imply error. However, conventional measures of self-enhancement are difference scores that do not distinguish a positive bias from a self-enhancement error, that is, they fail to identify those individuals who hold an irrationally or inaccurately positive view of themselves. We propose 2 new measures to separate error from bias. In the domain of personality judgment, we estimate a defensible bias and an enhancement error from indi...
18 CitationsSource
We conduct two experimental tests of the claim that people are overconfident, using new tests of overplacement that are based on a formal Bayesian model. Our two experiments, on easy quizzes, find that people overplace themselves. More precisely, we find apparently overconfident data that cannot be accounted for by a rational population of expected utility maximizers who care only about money. The finding represents new evidence of overconfidence that is robust to the Bayesian critique offered b...
34 CitationsSource
#1Elizabeth R. Tenney (UofU: University of Utah)H-Index: 15
#2Jennifer Marie Logg (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 8
Last. Don A. Moore (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 53
view all 3 authors...
A series of experiments investigated why people value optimism and whether they are right to do so. In Experiments 1A and 1B, participants prescribed more optimism for someone implementing decisions than for someone deliberating, indicating that people prescribe optimism selectively, when it can affect performance. Furthermore, participants believed optimism improved outcomes when a person�s actions had considerable, rather than little, influence over the outcome (Experiment 2). Experiments 3 an...
39 CitationsSource
#1Daylian M. Cain (Yale University)H-Index: 20
#2Don A. Moore (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 53
Last. Uriel Haran (BGU: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)H-Index: 7
view all 3 authors...
Entrepreneurs are often described as overconfident (or at least very confident), even when entering difficult markets. However, recent laboratory findings suggest that difficult tasks tend to produce underconfidence. How do entrepreneurs maintain confidence in difficult tasks? Our two laboratory experiments and one archival study reconcile the literature by distinguishing types of overconfidence and identifying what type is most prominent in each type of task. Furthermore, we critically examine ...
66 CitationsSource
#1Gabriele Paolacci (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 16
#2Jesse Chandler (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 26
Mechanical Turk (MTurk), an online labor market created by Amazon, has recently become popular among social scientists as a source of survey and experimental data. The workers who populate this market have been assessed on dimensions that are universally relevant to understanding whether, why, and when they should be recruited as research participants. We discuss the characteristics of MTurk as a participant pool for psychology and other social sciences, highlighting the traits of the MTurk samp...
1,432 CitationsSource
#1Ulrike Hahn (Birkbeck, University of London)H-Index: 37
#2Adam J. L. Harris (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 16
In this chapter, we provide a historical overview of research on bias in human cognition, ranging from early work in psychology through the detailed, quantitative examinations of belief revision in the 1960s, the Heuristic and Biases program initiated by Kahneman and Tversky, and bias focused research in personality and social psychology. Different notions of “bias” are identified and compared with the notion of bias in statistics, machine learning, and signal detection theory. Comparison with n...
48 CitationsSource
#1Michael M. Roy (Elizabethtown College)H-Index: 12
#2Michael J. Liersch (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 7
We examined whether people recognized that others might disagree with their high self-assessments of driving ability, and, if so, why. Participants in four experiments expressed a belief that others would assess them as worse drivers than they assessed themselves. This difference appears to be caused by participants’ use of their own, idiosyncratic definition of driving ability. In Experiments 2 and 3 participants reported that others would supply similar assessments of their ability when the sk...
17 CitationsSource
#1James A. Shepperd (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 40
#2William M. P. Klein (NIH: National Institutes of Health)H-Index: 63
Last. Neil D. Weinstein (RU: Rutgers University)H-Index: 66
view all 4 authors...
Researchers have used terms such as unrealistic optimism and optimistic bias to refer to concepts that are similar but not synonymous. Drawing from 3 decades of research, we discuss critically how researchers define unrealistic optimism, and we identify four types that reflect different measurement approaches: unrealistic absolute optimism at the individual and group levels and unrealistic comparative optimism at the individual and group levels. In addition, we discuss methodological criticisms ...
171 CitationsSource
Many challenging decisions are made under uncertainty, forcing managers to judge situations without in-depth knowledge of details or potential future outcomes. Earlier research shows that people tend to be overconfident about the accuracy of their judgments and comparatively optimistic about their future prospects, which means that people believe that they are more likely than others to experience positive events and less likely to suffer negative ones. Managers are likely to make decisions base...
3 CitationsSource
Cited By14
Newest
People tend to regard themselves as better than average. We conducted a replication and extension of Alicke’s classic study on trait dimensions in evaluations of self versus others with U.S. Americ...
2 CitationsSource
#1Liam Hyland (University of the Witwatersrand)
#2Avani Sebastian (University of the Witwatersrand)
Last. Yudhvir Seetharam (University of the Witwatersrand)H-Index: 4
view all 3 authors...
Orientation: Behavioural finance research suggests that human biases can cause irrationalities which have a significant impact on decision making. Discovery Bank is an organisation that attempts to apply behavioural finance to improve the financial health of its clients. Research purpose: This study attempts to determine the extent to which the Discovery Bank business model is grounded in behavioural finance theory. Motivation for the study: Discovery Bank is the first bank to leverage behaviour...
Source
#1Michael Thaler (Princeton University)H-Index: 3
Men and women systematically differ in their beliefs about their performance relative to others; in particular, men tend to be more overconfident. This paper provides support for one explanation for gender differences in overconfidence, performance-motivated reasoning, in which people distort how they process new information in ways that make them believe they outperformed others. Using a large online experiment, I find that male subjects distort information processing in ways that favor their p...
1 Citations
Past research has shown that how people rate their physical attractiveness is only moderately correlated with how they are rated by others, suggesting that at least some people have little insight into their true level of attractiveness. The present research tests the hypothesis that unattractive people are not aware of their unattractiveness. In fact, six studies (overall N = 1,180) showed that unattractive participants considerably overestimated their attractiveness compared to ratings by stra...
Source
#1Ashley V. Whillans (Harvard University)H-Index: 10
#2Alexander H. Jordan (Harvard University)H-Index: 19
Last. Frances S. ChenH-Index: 18
view all 3 authors...
Our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are shaped in critical ways by our beliefs about how we compare to other people. Prior research has predominately focused on the consequences of believing oneself to be better than average (BTA). Research on the consequences of worse-than-average (WTA) beliefs has been far more limited, focusing mostly on the downsides of WTA beliefs. In this paper, we argue for the systematic investigation of the possible long-term benefits of WTA beliefs in domains includi...
2 CitationsSource
#1Gregory P. Tapis (MSU: Missouri State University)
#1Gregory P. Tapis (MSU: Missouri State University)H-Index: 3
Last. Kanu Priya (MSU: Missouri State University)
view all 2 authors...
Data analytics is receiving increasing emphasis in accounting programs. This emphasis has emerged from both practitioners and accrediting bodies. In April 2018, the Association to Advance Collegiat...
1 CitationsSource
#1Ethan Zell (UNCG: University of North Carolina at Greensboro)H-Index: 19
#2Jason E. Strickhouser (FSU: Florida State University)H-Index: 10
Last. Mark D. Alicke (OU: Ohio University)H-Index: 33
view all 4 authors...
The better-than-average-effect (BTAE) is the tendency for people to perceive their abilities, attributes, and personality traits as superior compared to their average peer. This article offers a comprehensive review of the BTAE and the first quantitative synthesis of the BTAE literature. We define the effect, differentiate it from related phenomena, and describe relevant methodological approaches, theories, and psychological mechanisms. Next, we present a comprehensive meta-analysis of BTAE stud...
26 CitationsSource
#1Emma J Williams (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 5
#2Adam Joinson (University of Bath)H-Index: 35
3 CitationsSource
#1Jane Miller (UI: University of Iowa)H-Index: 3
#2Paul D. Windschitl (UI: University of Iowa)H-Index: 23
Last. Aaron M. Scherer (UIHC: University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics)H-Index: 12
view all 4 authors...
Abstract People sometimes modify their behavior based on whether they believe they do more or less of that behavior than others. But are people's perceptions of their social-comparative status for behaviors generally accurate? The current research assessed accuracy and bias in perceived social-comparative status for a number of health-related behaviors. In two studies, participants estimated their social-comparative percentile regarding behavior frequency for 20 behaviors—pre-classified accordin...
4 CitationsSource
#1Nelson Cowan (MU: University of Missouri)H-Index: 92
#2Eryn J. Adams (MU: University of Missouri)H-Index: 1
Last. Ashley L. Watts (MU: University of Missouri)H-Index: 16
view all 17 authors...
We consider the topic of arrogance from a cross-disciplinary viewpoint. To stimulate further research, we suggest three types of arrogance (individual, comparative, and antagonistic) and six compon...
Source