Minimally invasive versus open pancreatic enucleation. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of surgical outcomes
Abstract
Parenchymal sparing procedures are gaining interest in pancreatic surgery and recent studies have reported that minimally invasive pancreatic enucleation may be associated with enhanced outcomes when compared with traditional surgery. By meta‐analyzing the available data from the literature, minimally invasive surgery is not at higher risk of pancreatic fistula and offers a number of advantages over conventional surgery for pancreatic...
Paper Details
Title
Minimally invasive versus open pancreatic enucleation. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of surgical outcomes
Published Date
Mar 25, 2018
Journal
Volume
117
Issue
7
Pages
1509 - 1516
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History