Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study
Abstract
null Objective null To examine whether the continuous updating of networks of prospectively planned randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (“living” network meta-analysis) provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis in comparative effectiveness of medical interventions earlier than the updating of conventional, pairwise meta-analysis. null Design null Empirical study of the accumulating evidence about the comparative effectiveness of...
Paper Details
Title
Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study
Published Date
Feb 28, 2018
Journal
Volume
360
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History