Impact of detecting potentially serious incidental findings during multi-modal imaging

Lorna Gibson; Thomas J. Littlejohns; Ligia Adamska; Steve Garratt; Nicola Doherty; Joanna M. Wardlaw; Giles Maskell; Michael Parker; Roger Brownsword; Paul M. Matthews; Jonathan Sellors; Cathie Sudlow

doi:https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13181.3

doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13181.3

Impact of detecting potentially serious incidental findings during multi-modal imaging

Lorna Gibson

31

,

Thomas J. Littlejohns

15

,

..., Cathie Sudlow

63

Wellcome open research

Volume: 2, Pages: 114 - 114

Published: Aug 2, 2018

Abstract

Background: There are limited data on the impact of feedback of incidental findings (IFs) from research imaging. We evaluated the impact of UK Biobank’s protocol for handling potentially serious IFs in a multi-modal imaging study of 100,000 participants (radiographer ‘flagging’ with radiologist confirmation of potentially serious IFs) compared with systematic radiologist review of all images....

Paper Fields

Paper Details

Title

Impact of detecting potentially serious incidental findings during multi-modal imaging

DOI

doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13181.3

Published Date

Aug 2, 2018

Journal

Wellcome open research

Volume

2

Pages

114 - 114

Citation AnalysisPro

You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro

Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?

Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.

Learn more

Notes

History