Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy—systematic review and meta-analysis

Volume: 402, Issue: 5, Pages: 841 - 851
Published: May 9, 2017
Abstract
The purpose of this systematic review was to compare minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) by using meta-analytical techniques.Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. Data from included studies were extracted for the following outcomes: operative time, overall morbidity, pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, blood loss, postoperative hemorrhage, yield of...
Paper Details
Title
Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy—systematic review and meta-analysis
Published Date
May 9, 2017
Volume
402
Issue
5
Pages
841 - 851
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.